Every category where a model named Adyen for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
B2B payment acceptance	Receivables and billing	0%	16 of 91	6%	18	accepted challenger
Cross-border payments and FX	Treasury and cash	0%	20 of 83	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by Wise Business at 35%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Adyen yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Adyen across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	2	0	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	3	0	4
Mistral Small	0	0	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	1	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	2	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	0	0	2
Kimi K2	0	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	1	0	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct22 labels7

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative39 labels13not counted in share

Budget-constrained12 labels4

Scale-constrained11 labelsNone

Negative17 labels6not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative103 labels in all, every segment counted; 11 of the 30 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Prefer established ones like Stripe or Adyen for B2B (high Gartner/G2 ratings, transparent pricing)” Grok 4.1 Fast · B2B payment acceptance · negative prompt · first choice

“Adyen is best suited for enterprise B2B payment processing at global scale” Claude Haiku 4.5 · B2B payment acceptance · comparative prompt · first choice

“Developer-led platform or marketplace: Stripe or Adyen” DeepSeek V4 Flash · B2B payment acceptance · comparative prompt · first choice

“Major established players like Stripe, Adyen, Wise Business, Payoneer, and ConnectPay generally have stronger track records” MiniMax M2.5 · B2B payment acceptance · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“More complex and enterprise-focused, may exceed SME needs.” Mistral Small · B2B payment acceptance · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Adyen, over the 103 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Adyen was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Stripe80 of 1037Not in the top three

Airwallex51 of 10310Not in the top three

Wise Business44 of 1034Not in the top three

Payoneer36 of 1030Not in the top three

HighRadius32 of 1033Not in the top three

Tipalti30 of 1030Not in the top three

BILL28 of 1030Not in the top three

PayPal27 of 1030Not in the top three

Worldpay23 of 1030Not in the top three

Thunes21 of 1038Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Adyen. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 90 of the 103 answers that named Adyen and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

connectpay.com71

highradius.com48

worldmetrics.org47

gartner.com43

airwallex.com34

theindustryleaders.org23

techrepublic.com22

rillion.com21

thebossmagazine.com19

triple-a.io18

346 of the 346 domain citations in answers naming Adyen came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

connectpay.com/blog/b2b-payment-platforms49

gartner.com/reviews/market/b2b-payments-software42

highradius.com/resources/Blog/best-b2b-payment-platforms31

worldmetrics.org/service/b2b-payment29

connectpay.com/blog/cross-border-payments-companies23

theindustryleaders.org/post/10-best-b2b-cross-border-payment-solutions-ranked-and-reviewed23

techrepublic.com/article/best-b2b-payment-processors20

rillion.com/blog/best-b2b-payment-platforms19

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Adyen

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Adyen; a claim can dispute any of them.

Adyen/Helcim 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Adyen's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Adyen, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at adyen.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.