Index › Products › ClearSight TEMs · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

ClearSight TEMs

5Judge labels

3First choices

0Negative labels

3 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ClearSight TEMs was named 3 times in Telecom expense mgmt, where Genuity led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business29 of 106

under the label threshold

Mid-market7 of 89

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In telecom expense mgmt · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ClearSight TEMs for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Telecom expense management	Spend and procurement	6%	7 of 89	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Genuity at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ClearSight TEMs yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ClearSight TEMs across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1
Mistral Small	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labels2

Paraphrase1 label1

Comparative2 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“ClearSight TEMs - an AI-powered telecom expense management platform that helps organizations analyze carrier invoices, identify billing errors” Llama 4 Maverick · Telecom expense mgmt · direct prompt · first choice

“If your company prioritizes AI-driven insights and a streamlined experience, ClearSight TEMs may be the best fit.” Mistral Small · Telecom expense mgmt · direct prompt · first choice

“I'd recommend ClearSight TEMs as a strong starting point” Grok 4.1 Fast · Telecom expense mgmt · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ClearSight TEMs, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ClearSight TEMs was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Genuity2 of 51Not among the top eight

LINQ Qonnect2 of 50Not among the top eight

Calero1 of 50Not among the top eight

Cass Info Systems1 of 50Not among the top eight

Foresight & Capstone Partners1 of 50Not among the top eight

Tangoe One Telecom1 of 50Not among the top eight

Temforce1 of 50Not among the top eight

Vigilis1 of 50Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ClearSight TEMs. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named ClearSight TEMs and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

capterra.com5

uplandsoftware.com5

geekflare.com3

gitnux.org3

softwaresuggest.com3

use.expensify.com3

projectmanagers.net2

softwareadvice.com2

worldmetrics.org2

capterra.ca1

No domain is on file for ClearSight TEMs, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

uplandsoftware.com/cimpl/technology-expense-management/best-telecom-expense-management-sof5

capterra.com/resources/best-telecom-expense-management-software-review-analysis4

geekflare.com/software/best-telecom-expense-management-solution3

gitnux.org/best/telecom-expense-management-software3

softwaresuggest.com/telecom-expense-management-software3

use.expensify.com/resource-center/guides/telecom-expense-management-solutions3

projectmanagers.net/top-telecom-expense-management-companies-for-project-managers2

softwareadvice.com/telecom-expense-management2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow ClearSight TEMs

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ClearSight TEMs's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ClearSight TEMs, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ClearSight TEMs by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where ClearSight TEMs is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name ClearSight TEMs, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.