Index › Products › LINQ Qonnect · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

LINQ Qonnect

6Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

5 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. LINQ Qonnect was named 4 times in Telecom expense mgmt, where Genuity led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business32 of 106

under the label threshold

Mid-market12 of 89

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In telecom expense mgmt · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named LINQ Qonnect for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Telecom expense management	Spend and procurement	2%	12 of 89	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Genuity at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for LINQ Qonnect yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated LINQ Qonnect across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labels1

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If mobile fleet management is a key requirement, LINQ Qonnect could be the better choice.” Mistral Small · Telecom expense mgmt · direct prompt · first choice

“LINQ Qonnect is also worth evaluating because it is described as a cloud-based billing and invoicing solution” Perplexity Sonar · Telecom expense mgmt · budget prompt · alternative

“LINQ Qonnect - a telecom expense management software that holds a 4.6-star rating across 32 reviews” Llama 4 Maverick · Telecom expense mgmt · direct prompt · alternative

“LINQ Qonnect if your biggest issue is managing a large mobile device fleet” GPT-5.4 mini · Telecom expense mgmt · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as LINQ Qonnect, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LINQ Qonnect was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Tangoe One Telecom3 of 60Not among the top eight

ClearSight TEMs2 of 61Not among the top eight

Microcall2 of 61Not among the top eight

Clearview1 of 61Not among the top eight

ExpenseLogic1 of 61Not among the top eight

Genuity1 of 61Not among the top eight

Temforce1 of 61Not among the top eight

Calero1 of 60Not among the top eight

Genuity IT Admin Suite1 of 60Not among the top eight

Kloudville1 of 60Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LINQ Qonnect. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 6 answers that named LINQ Qonnect and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

capterra.com6

uplandsoftware.com4

use.expensify.com4

g2.com3

getapp.com3

softwareadvice.com3

softwaresuggest.com3

cybernews.com2

gearbrain.com2

geekflare.com2

No domain is on file for LINQ Qonnect, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

capterra.com/resources/best-telecom-expense-management-software-review-analysis6

uplandsoftware.com/cimpl/technology-expense-management/best-telecom-expense-management-sof4

use.expensify.com/resource-center/guides/telecom-expense-management-solutions4

getapp.com/it-communications-software/telecom-expense-management3

getapp.com/it-communications-software/telecom-expense-management/f/cost-tracking3

softwareadvice.com/telecom-expense-management3

softwaresuggest.com/telecom-expense-management-software3

cybernews.com/it-management/best-technology-expense-management-solutions2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow LINQ Qonnect

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LINQ Qonnect's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LINQ Qonnect, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for LINQ Qonnect by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where LINQ Qonnect is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name LINQ Qonnect, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.