Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Credit Hound · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Credit Hound

10Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Credit Hound was named 4 times in B2B credit management, where Tesorio led with 16%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business20 of 78

under the label threshold

Mid-market32 of 82

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In b2b credit management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Credit Hound for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
B2B credit management	Receivables and billing	0%	32 of 82	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Tesorio at 16%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Credit Hound yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Credit Hound across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	2	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Credit Hound, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Credit Hound was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Paidnice10 of 102Not in the top three

Satago10 of 101Not in the top three

Chaser9 of 103Not in the top three

HighRadius Credit Cloud7 of 101Not in the top three

Esker3 of 101Not in the top three

Upflow3 of 101Not in the top three

Billtrust3 of 100Not in the top three

Creditsafe3 of 100Not in the top three

Bectran2 of 101Not in the top three

Kolleno2 of 100Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Credit Hound. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 10 answers that named Credit Hound and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

chaserhq.com10

creditpulse.com9

guideflow.com9

learn.g2.com7

zipdo.co7

nuvo.com6

tesorio.com6

accounting.events5

trove.works5

wifitalents.com5

Sixty-nine of the sixty-nine domain citations in answers naming Credit Hound came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

chaserhq.com/blog/best-credit-management-software10

creditpulse.com/blog/best-credit-management-software9

guideflow.com/blog/credit-management-software9

learn.g2.com/best-credit-and-collections-software7

nuvo.com/resources/credit-management-software6

tesorio.com/blog/the-5-best-credit-risk-management-software-platforms-for-b2b-finance-team6

zipdo.co/best/creditmanagement-software6

worldmetrics.org/best/credit-management-software5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Credit Hound

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Credit Hound; a claim can dispute any of them.

Satago / Credit Hound 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Credit Hound's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Credit Hound, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at credithoundcloud.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.