Every category where a model named Sidetrade for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Accounts receivable automation	Receivables and billing	0%	33 of 77	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Zoho Books at 15%
B2B credit management	Receivables and billing	0%	65 of 82	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by Tesorio at 16%
Cash application	Receivables and billing	0%	38 of 83	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by HighRadius at 16%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Sidetrade yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Sidetrade across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	2	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct10 labelsNone

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative12 labelsNone

Budget-constrained7 labelsNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative9 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative46 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Mid‑market tools like Chaser, Kolleno, and Sidetrade typically have faster implementations and clearer pricing.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Accounts receivable auto · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“worth considering if you want an AI-native AR platform with strong cash application” GPT-5.4 mini · Cash application · direct prompt · alternative

“Large organizations needing policy-driven collections and forecasting” Perplexity Sonar · B2B credit management · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Enterprise suites (HighRadius, Sidetrade) are powerful but may be overbuilt/pricier than you need” DeepSeek V4 Flash · B2B credit management · scale prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Sidetrade, over the 46 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sidetrade was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Billtrust34 of 461Not in the top three

HighRadius30 of 4619Not in the top three

Esker30 of 463Not in the top three

Versapay20 of 460Not in the top three

HighRadius Credit Cloud16 of 467Not in the top three

BlackLine Invoice-to-Cash9 of 461Not in the top three

Gaviti9 of 461Not in the top three

Emagia9 of 460Not in the top three

Tesorio9 of 460Not in the top three

Chaser8 of 461Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Sidetrade. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 37 of the 46 answers that named Sidetrade and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

highradius.com29

stuut.ai17

worldmetrics.org17

tesorio.com15

transformance.ai15

chaserhq.com12

emagia.com12

billtrust.com11

bluecopa.com10

lunos.ai10

148 of the 148 domain citations in answers naming Sidetrade came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/credit-management-software9

stuut.ai/blog/best-ar-automation-software-2026-comparison-guide9

billtrust.com/resources/blog/top-accounts-receivable-software-solutions8

creditpulse.com/blog/best-credit-management-software8

ledgerup.ai/resources/top-10-ar-automation-software-in-20258

nuvo.com/resources/credit-management-software8

onguard.com/best-credit-management-software8

tesorio.com/blog/the-5-best-credit-risk-management-software-platforms-for-b2b-finance-team8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sidetrade's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sidetrade, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sidetrade.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.