Index › Vendors › D&B Finance Analytics Credit Intelligence · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

D&B Finance Analytics Credit Intelligence

3Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

2 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. D&B Finance Analytics Credit Intelligence was named 2 times in B2B credit management, where Tesorio led with 16%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market30 of 82

under the label threshold

Enterprise31 of 70

under the label threshold

In b2b credit management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named D&B Finance Analytics Credit Intelligence for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
B2B credit management	Receivables and billing	0%	30 of 82	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Tesorio at 16%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for D&B Finance Analytics Credit Intelligence yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated D&B Finance Analytics Credit Intelligence across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	1	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you want to approve customers and set credit limits: start with D&B Finance Analytics or Creditsafe.” GPT-5.4 mini · B2B credit management · comparative prompt · first choice

“Best if your main need is credit risk data and decisioning” GPT-5.4 mini · B2B credit management · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as D&B Finance Analytics Credit Intelligence, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and D&B Finance Analytics Credit Intelligence was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Quadient AR2 of 31Not in the top three

Bectran2 of 30Not in the top three

Billtrust2 of 30Not in the top three

Creditsafe2 of 30Not in the top three

Nuvo2 of 30Not in the top three

Tesorio2 of 30Not in the top three

HighRadius Credit Cloud1 of 31Not in the top three

Chaser1 of 30Not in the top three

Esker1 of 30Not in the top three

Gaviti1 of 30Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named D&B Finance Analytics Credit Intelligence. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named D&B Finance Analytics Credit Intelligence and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com3

accountsreceivable.ai1

capterra.co.uk1

capterra.com1

chaserhq.com1

chatfin.ai1

creditbenchmark.com1

creditpulse.com1

creditsafe.com1

gitnux.org1

No domain is on file for D&B Finance Analytics Credit Intelligence, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

g2.com/categories/credit-and-collections2

g2.com/categories/credit-and-collections/enterprise2

accountsreceivable.ai/compare/highradius-vs-billtrust1

capterra.co.uk/compare/202723/1016762/d-b-finance-analytics/vs/creditsafe1

capterra.com/p/202723/D-B-Finance-Analytics1

capterra.com/p/213360/YayPay1

chaserhq.com/blog/best-credit-management-software1

chatfin.ai/blog/highradius-vs-billtrust-for-order-to-cash-20261

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when D&B Finance Analytics Credit Intelligence's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as D&B Finance Analytics Credit Intelligence, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.