Every category where a model named Versapay for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
B2B payment acceptance	Receivables and billing	17%	2 of 91	0%	16	accepted challenger
Accounts receivable automation	Receivables and billing	12%	2 of 77	7%	28	accepted challenger
Cash application	Receivables and billing	11%	2 of 83	11%	28	accepted challenger
Invoicing software	Receivables and billing	2%	8 of 86	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Wave at 19%
Business bill pay	Treasury and cash	0%	23 of 69	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by BILL at 35%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Versapay yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Versapay across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	6	2	0	9
GPT-5.4 mini	2	0	1	0	3
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	8	1	1	12
Perplexity Sonar	2	1	2	0	5
Grok 4.1 Fast	3	5	2	0	10
Mistral Small	0	1	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	3	5	0	3	11
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	2	0	4
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	2	0	1	5
Kimi K2	2	4	1	0	7
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	4	1	0	6
MiniMax M2.5	1	3	0	0	4

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct38 labels7

Paraphrase41 labels14

Comparative45 labelsNone

Budget-constrained12 labelsNone

Scale-constrained18 labels1

Negative12 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative166 labels in all, every segment counted; 22 of the 24 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I’d recommend Versapay as the default choice if you want the strongest balance of collections automation, promise-to-pay tracking, and team workflow control” Perplexity Sonar · Accounts receivable auto · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Versapay: Highly recommended if you have collaborative, customer-facing relationships and want a highly intuitive, shared customer portal.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Accounts receivable auto · scale prompt · first choice

“Best for mid-market B2B companies wanting cash application bundled with payment rails and a collaborative customer portal” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Cash application · direct prompt · first choice

“my default recommendation would be Versapay if your main goal is payment matching / cash application automation” GPT-5.4 mini · Cash application · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“What to avoid on a limited budget - Versapay ... Definitely not budget-friendly.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Cash application · budget prompt · hard negative

“Avoid mid-market/enterprise platforms (Versapay, Tesorio, HighRadius)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Accounts receivable auto · budget prompt · hard negative

“Reviews highlight limited backend automation, lack of native credit or deduction management, and weak integration capabilities” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Cash application · negative prompt · soft negative

“Caution Level: Medium (for ERP integration and reporting)... integration is a beast... rules-based logic can misfire” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Cash application · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Versapay, over the 166 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Versapay was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

HighRadius127 of 16645Compare →

Billtrust119 of 16612Compare →

Esker57 of 1662Not in the top three

BILL41 of 1668Not in the top three

Tesorio41 of 1662Not in the top three

Quadient AR36 of 1664Compare →

BlackLine Cash Application34 of 1661Not in the top three

Upflow32 of 1663Compare →

Gaviti31 of 1662Not in the top three

Chaser28 of 1663Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Versapay. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 141 of the 166 answers that named Versapay and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

highradius.com101

chaserhq.com54

stuut.ai53

transformance.ai50

worldmetrics.org49

lunos.ai47

billtrust.com45

upflow.io40

learn.g2.com39

rex.inc38

516 of the 516 domain citations in answers naming Versapay came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

highradius.com/resources/Blog/best-cash-application-automation-tools38

trevipay.com/resource-center/blog/best-accounts-receivable-automation-software34

rex.inc/resources/comparisons/best-cash-application-software32

billtrust.com/resources/blog/top-accounts-receivable-software-solutions31

cashbook.com/best-cash-application-tools-2026-official-guide30

learn.g2.com/best-accounts-receivable-software29

upflow.io/software/best-cash-application-software29

younium.com/blog/accounts-receivable-software29

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Versapay

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Versapay; a claim can dispute any of them.

VersaPay 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Versapay's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Versapay, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at versapay.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.