Every category where a model named Infor CloudSuite for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
ERP systems	Accounting and close	0%	10 of 70	0%	8	under 10 labels · led by Oracle NetSuite at 38%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Infor CloudSuite yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Infor CloudSuite across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	3	3
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct8 labelsNone

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative14 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative32 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Heavy-duty options if you are in complex manufacturing, distribution, or asset-intensive industries.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ERP systems · scale prompt · alternative

“For Discrete Manufacturing: Infor CloudSuite Industrial or MFG.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ERP systems · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Infor CloudSuite, over the 32 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Infor CloudSuite was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

SAP S/4HANA25 of 3211Not in the top three

Oracle NetSuite22 of 323Not in the top three

Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP21 of 326Not in the top three

Microsoft Dynamics 36515 of 323Not in the top three

Acumatica15 of 321Not in the top three

Workday13 of 320Not in the top three

Odoo12 of 320Not in the top three

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations8 of 322Not in the top three

Sage Intacct8 of 320Not in the top three

Epicor Kinetic7 of 320Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Infor CloudSuite. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 19 of the 32 answers that named Infor CloudSuite and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

erpresearch.com17

zapier.com9

erp-pilot.com8

forbes.com8

learn.g2.com7

netsuite.com7

spendesk.com6

clefincode.com5

topdynamicspartners.com4

busistack.com3

Seventy-four of the seventy-four domain citations in answers naming Infor CloudSuite came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

zapier.com/blog/best-erp-software9

erp-pilot.com/erp/best-erp-software8

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-erp-systems8

erpresearch.com/best-erp-software7

erpresearch.com/en-us/erp-vendors7

learn.g2.com/best-erp-software7

spendesk.com/blog/top-erp-systems6

clefincode.com/blog/global-digital-vibes/en/comparative-analysis-of-leading-erp-systems-205

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Infor CloudSuite

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Infor CloudSuite; a claim can dispute any of them.

Infor CloudSuite Industrial 2IFS / Infor CloudSuite 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Infor CloudSuite's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Infor CloudSuite, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at infor.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.