Every category where a model named Workday Financial Management for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Revenue recognition	Accounting and close	0%	40 of 77	17%	6	under 10 labels · led by Maxio at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Workday Financial Management yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Workday Financial Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct14 labelsNone

Paraphrase15 labels1

Comparative22 labelsNone

Budget-constrained9 labels1

Scale-constrained5 labelsNone

Negative16 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative81 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Larger enterprises needing integrated financials — possibly overkill at 500 people” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Revenue recognition · scale prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Workday Financial Management, over the 81 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Workday Financial Management was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Oracle NetSuite39 of 819Not in the top three

SAP S/4HANA38 of 8114Not in the top three

Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP28 of 818Not in the top three

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance27 of 812Not in the top three

Sage Intacct26 of 811Not in the top three

Zuora Revenue25 of 8111Not in the top three

NetSuite Advanced Revenue Management23 of 811Not in the top three

SAP Revenue Accounting and Reporting23 of 810Not in the top three

RightRev22 of 813Not in the top three

Maxio15 of 811Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Workday Financial Management. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 69 of the 81 answers that named Workday Financial Management and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

rightrev.com28

worldmetrics.org26

dualentry.com24

erpresearch.com23

guideflow.com20

younium.com19

eleven.run18

highradius.com17

hubifi.com17

gitnux.org16

208 of the 208 domain citations in answers naming Workday Financial Management came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

rightrev.com/top-revenue-recognition-software-2026-a-comprehensive-buyers-guide26

eleven.run/blog/best-revenue-recognition-software18

dualentry.com/blog/best-revenue-recognition-software17

younium.com/blog/revenue-recognition-software17

ledgerup.ai/resources/7-best-revenue-recognition-software-for-saas-202615

guideflow.com/blog/revenue-recognition-software14

zenskar.com/buyers-guide/revenue-recognition-software14

highradius.com/resources/Blog/best-revenue-recognition-tools12

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Workday Financial Management

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Workday Financial Management; a claim can dispute any of them.

Workday 3Workday / SAP RAR 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Workday Financial Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Workday Financial Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at workday.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.