Index › Products › Intercompany Corporate® · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Intercompany Corporate®

3Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

3 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Intercompany Corporate® was named 3 times in Transfer pricing, where TPGenie led with 30%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market11 of 101

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In transfer pricing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Intercompany Corporate® for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Transfer pricing	Tax and compliance	2%	11 of 101	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by TPGenie at 30%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Intercompany Corporate® yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Intercompany Corporate® across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labels1

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“1. Intercompany Corporate® by Intercompany Software” Llama 4 Maverick · Transfer pricing · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“the Intercompany Corporate® offers a balanced solution between foundational and advanced capabilities” Muse Glimmer 30B · Transfer pricing · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Specifically positioned for mid-sized corporations with more intricate transfer pricing needs” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Transfer pricing · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Intercompany Corporate®, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Intercompany Corporate® was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

TPGenie3 of 31Not among the top eight

Sovos Transfer Pricing2 of 31Not among the top eight

t02 of 30Not among the top eight

Aibidia1 of 30Not among the top eight

Commenda1 of 30Not among the top eight

Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Transfer Pricing1 of 30Not among the top eight

Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Transfer Pricing Documenter1 of 30Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Intercompany Corporate®. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named Intercompany Corporate® and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

commenda.io3

intercompany-software.comYour site3

sourceforge.net3

intrapricing.com2

zipdo.co2

axiobench.com1

digitalheroesco.com1

finance.toolsinfo.com1

gitnux.org1

intercompany.io1

Fifteen of the eighteen domain citations in answers naming Intercompany Corporate® came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

commenda.io/transfer-pricing3

intercompany-software.com/product/editions.html3

intrapricing.com/2

sourceforge.net/software/transfer-pricing2

sourceforge.net/software/transfer-pricing/for-mid-size-business2

zipdo.co/best/transfer-pricing-software2

axiobench.com/best/transfer-pricing-software1

commenda.io/blog/best-global-trade-compliance-software1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Intercompany Corporate®

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Intercompany Corporate®; a claim can dispute any of them.

Intercompany Corporate® by Intercompany Software 1

Follow Intercompany Corporate®

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Intercompany Corporate®'s standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Intercompany Corporate®, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Intercompany Corporate® by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Intercompany Corporate® is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Intercompany Corporate®, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.