Transfer pricing
Asked as “transfer pricing platform”, and as “intercompany transfer pricing documentation tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 53 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the October 2026 Edition on October 4, 2026; its answers are read by the distilled judge (ai-indexes-judge-qwen3-14b-run3), not the claude-opus-5 judge of the earlier categories: how the two compare.
Standing · first-choice share
30%
Contested · TPdoc 11%
30TPGenie11TPdoc08Commenda51others
30% of first choices, contested.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
04
Exactera Transfer Pricing8%27%26criticized challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 8% now.
Exactera Transfer Pricing8%27%26criticized challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 8% now.05Sovos Transfer Pricing4%13%15accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 4% now.
06
Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Transfer Pricing4%18%11accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 4% now.
Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Transfer Pricing4%18%11accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 4% now.08
PlaidCloud Operational Transfer Pricing2%0%13accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
PlaidCloud Operational Transfer Pricing2%0%13accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.09
Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE2%50%14criticized challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE2%50%14criticized challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
10ONESOURCE Transfer Pricing0%27%11criticized challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
11Bloomberg Tax Transfer Pricing0%20%10accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
TPGenie vs Sovos Transfer PricingTPGenie vs Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Transfer PricingTPGenie vs AibidiaTPGenie vs PlaidCloud Operational Transfer PricingTPdoc vs CommendaTPdoc vs Exactera Transfer PricingTPdoc vs Sovos Transfer PricingTPdoc vs Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Transfer PricingTPdoc vs AibidiaTPdoc vs PlaidCloud Operational Transfer PricingCommenda vs Exactera Transfer PricingCommenda vs Sovos Transfer PricingCommenda vs Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Transfer PricingCommenda vs AibidiaCommenda vs PlaidCloud Operational Transfer PricingExactera Transfer Pricing vs Sovos Transfer PricingExactera Transfer Pricing vs Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Transfer PricingExactera Transfer Pricing vs AibidiaExactera Transfer Pricing vs PlaidCloud Operational Transfer PricingSovos Transfer Pricing vs Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Transfer PricingSovos Transfer Pricing vs AibidiaSovos Transfer Pricing vs PlaidCloud Operational Transfer PricingThomson Reuters ONESOURCE Transfer Pricing vs AibidiaThomson Reuters ONESOURCE Transfer Pricing vs PlaidCloud Operational Transfer PricingAibidia vs PlaidCloud Operational Transfer Pricing
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
T01
T02
0304S05
06
070809O10
B11
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01TPGenie30%
02TPdoc11%
03Commenda8%
Commenda8%04Exactera Transfer Pricing8%
Exactera Transfer Pricing8%05Sovos Transfer Pricing4%
06Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Transfer Pricing4%
Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Transfer Pricing4%07Aibidia2%
Aibidia2%08PlaidCloud Operational Transfer Pricing2%
PlaidCloud Operational Transfer Pricing2%09Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE2%
Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE2%10ONESOURCE Transfer Pricing0%
11Bloomberg Tax Transfer Pricing0%
What they warned about
Three of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Exactera Transfer Pricing27%
7 of 26 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Platforms like Exactera start at ~$15,400/year — likely overkill for limited budgets” Kimi K2, budget prompt
Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE50%
7 of 14 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“you generally want to avoid the legacy "enterprise" giants (like Wolters Kluwig CCH or Thomson Reuters ONEsource)” Qwen 3.7 Flash, budget prompt
Commenda21%
5 of 24 labels negative · 5 of 14 models
“complex interface, tax issues with glitches during onboarding, slow data uploads, technical issues, and integration challenges” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
Aibidia15%
5 of 33 labels negative · 4 of 14 models
“users of Aibidia note constraints in formatting/customization, which can become a problem if your tax team needs very specific deliverables” GPT-5.4 mini, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
79 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1105 links across 199 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. None of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category.
51 answers · 61 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Sourceforge42 answers · 77 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Worldmetrics42 answers · 46 citations · 11 models
42 answers · 42 citations · 12 models
41 answers · 51 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G236 answers · 49 citations · 12 models
32 answers · 77 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Commenda32 answers · 48 citations · 13 models
27 answers · 39 citations · 12 models
24 answers · 31 citations · 9 models
12 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
12 answers · 14 citations · 6 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
47 answers · 11 models
41 answers · 12 models
36 answers · 10 models
35 answers · 11 models
28 answers · 11 models
24 answers · 11 models
22 answers · 12 models
19 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 8 models
15 answers · 9 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best transfer pricing platform”, “transfer pricing platform”, “transfer pricing platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TPGenie | 30% | 10 | 0 | |||||
| TPdoc | 11% | 10 | 0 | |||||
| Commenda commenda.io | 8% | 110 | 390 | 5 | 569,684 | $5,224 | 0 | |
| Exactera exactera.com Exactera Transfer Pricing 8% | 8% | 77 | 390 | 4 | 725 company | 0 | 4 | |
| myTransferPricing mytransferpricing.com | 8% | 10 | 0 | 1 | ||||
| Thomson Reuters thomsonreuters.com Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Transfer Pricing 4%, Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE 2% | 6% | 92 | 590 | 5 | 3,055,379 company | $313 | 120 | |
| Sovos sovos.com Sovos Transfer Pricing 4% | 4% | 45 | 3,600 | 220 | 95,951 company | 93 | ||
| Caribou usecaribou.com | 4% | 32 | 201,000 | 30,293 | 271 | 4 | ||
| Aibidia aibidia.com | 2% | 96 | 90 | 1 | 1,954 | 4 | 1 | |
| PlaidCloud Operational Transfer Pricing plaidcloud.com | 2% | 41 | 0 | 126 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 16 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (g2.com, getsphere.com, intrapricing.com). The first result for “best transfer pricing platform” is g2.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best transfer pricing platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which intercompany transfer pricing documentation tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top transfer pricing platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best transfer pricing platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a transfer pricing platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which transfer pricing platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Caribou, Exactera Transfer Pricingagainst: Bloomberg Tax Transfer PricingReptuneChangedONESOURCE Transfer PricingTP Accurateno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
PlaidCloud Operational Transfer Pricing, ReptuneThree alternatives
Aibidia, TPdoc, Zanders GroupFive alternatives
ArmsLength AI, Bloomberg Tax Transfer Pricing, CCH Transfer Pricing, Caribou, Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Transfer PricingThree alternatives
Commenda, Gather.nexus, TPGenieGPT-5.4 miniThomson Reuters ONESOURCE Transfer PricingThomson Reuters ONESOURCE Transfer PricingHeldno first choiceExactera Transfer Pricingagainst: TaxDomeno first choiceagainst: Aibidia, Exactera Transfer Pricing
One alternative
Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Transfer PricingGemini 3.5 FlashExactera Transfer Pricingagainst: Thomson Reuters ONESOURCETPGenie, TPdocChangedno first choicemyTransferPricingagainst: Bloomberg Tax Transfer Pricing, Thomson Reuters ONESOURCEno first choiceagainst: CCH Tagetik, SAP modulesnothing named
Three alternatives
Aibidia, PlaidCloud Operational Transfer Pricing, TPGenieFive alternatives
Aibidia, Commenda, Exactera Transfer Pricing, PlaidCloud Operational Transfer Pricing, SupernomialThree alternatives
ArmsLength AI, Commenda, TPdocPerplexity SonarCommendaTPdocChangedno first choiceTPGenieagainst: KPMG-style advisory-led solutionsno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
HighRadius, TPGenieGrok 4.1 FastTPGenieagainst: EY Serafim, Oracle, SAP TPTPGenieHeldagainst: Aibidia, Sovos Transfer PricingPlaidCloud Operational Transfer Pricingagainst: Oracle, SAP S/4HANACommenda, TPGenieAibidia, Thomson Reuters ONESOURCEagainst: Commenda, Integral, Reptune.net
Four alternatives
Aibidia, Commenda, PlaidCloud Operational Transfer Pricing, Zanders Transfer Pricing SuiteOne alternative
TPdocEight alternatives
CCH, Caribou, Commenda, Exactera Transfer Pricing, Reptune.net, TPbenchmark, Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Transfer Pricing, Wolters KluwerOne alternative
PlaidCloud Operational Transfer PricingOne alternative
TPGenieMistral SmallSpherion, TPdocTPdocChangedThomson Reuters ONESOURCE Transfer Pricing, Wolters Kluwer CCH IntegratorTPGenieno first choicenothing named
One alternative
TPGenieThree alternatives
Caribou, TPGenie, Vertex Transfer PricingDeepSeek V4 FlashCaribouagainst: Aibidia, Integral, ONESOURCE Transfer PricingTPGenieChangedagainst: Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Transfer PricingONESOURCE Transfer PricingmyTransferPricingno first choiceagainst: Aibidia, LexisNexis, Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE, Wolters Kluwer
Two alternatives
TPGenie, Zanders Transfer Pricing SuiteTwo alternatives
Intercompany Corporate®, t0Five alternatives
Caribou, Commenda, Exactera Transfer Pricing, Longview Transfer Pricing, TPbenchmarkTwo alternatives
Commenda, PlaidCloud Operational Transfer PricingFive alternatives
Aibidia, CCH Tagetik, Orbit Analytics, Sovos Transfer Pricing, TPGenieLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceIntercompany Corporate®Changedno first choiceTPGenieno first choiceagainst: Traditional banks, WeTransfer, Western Union
Five alternatives
Aibidia, Commenda, Sovos Transfer Pricing, TPGenie, t0Qwen 3.7 FlashLongview Transfer Pricingagainst: ONESOURCE Transfer PricingTPdocChangedagainst: Oracle Taxation, SAP BTMTPGenieMaven: Transfer Pricingagainst: Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE, Wolters Kluwig CCHCommenda, Transplaceagainst: Thomson Reuters ONESOURCEagainst: Commenda, Exactera Transfer Pricing, Longview Tax, TPGenie
One alternative
TPGenieOne alternative
SAP Business Technology PlatformFive alternatives
Aibidia, EY Transfer Pricing Engine, Exactera Transfer Pricing, Integral, Sovos Transfer PricingThree alternatives
BDO, PwC, SoftProKimi K2Exactera Transfer PricingTPGenieChangedThomson Reuters ONESOURCEmyTransferPricingagainst: Exactera Transfer Pricingno first choiceagainst: Commenda, LexisNexis, Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE, Wolters Kluwer
Three alternatives
Caribou, Commenda, TPGenieThree alternatives
Aibidia, Commenda, ONESOURCE Transfer PricingFive alternatives
Aibidia, Caribou, Longview Tax, PlaidCloud Operational Transfer Pricing, Wolters KluwerOne alternative
TPGenieGLM 4.7 FlashXTPGenieTPGenieHeldCCH Tagetik, Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Transfer PricingmyTransferPricingno first choiceagainst: Commenda, Exactera Transfer Pricing, LexisNexis, Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE, Wolter Kluwer
Four alternatives
Aibidia, Commenda, PlaidCloud Operational Transfer Pricing, Sovos Transfer PricingThree alternatives
Intercompany Software, KPMG tpEngine, ONESOURCE Transfer PricingFour alternatives
Capgemini TP Catalyst, Exactera Transfer Pricing, Oracle NetSuite, SAP S/4HANAThree alternatives
Reptune, TPGenie, TPbenchmarkMiniMax M2.5PlaidCloud Operational Transfer PricingTPGenie, TPdocChangedTPGeniet0no first choiceagainst: Commenda, Exactera Transfer Pricing
Two alternatives
Commenda, TPGenieOne alternative
IntegralFour alternatives
Aibidia, Exactera Transfer Pricing, Reptune.net, Sovos Transfer PricingThree alternatives
Gather.nexus, PlaidCloud Operational Transfer Pricing, ServicewareGPT-6 LunaCommendaTPGenieChangedAibidia, CCH Tagetik Operational Transfer PricingTPGenie Basicno first choiceagainst: Aibidia, Exactera Transfer Pricing, ONESOURCE Transfer Pricing, Orbitax
Three alternatives
Aibidia, TPGenie, Thomson Reuters ONESOURCEOne alternative
Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Transfer Pricing DocumenterFour alternatives
Exactera Transfer Pricing, Moody's TP Catalyst, RoyaltyRange, TPGenieMuse Glimmer 30BSovos Transfer Pricing, TPGenieSovos Transfer PricingChangedThomson Reuters ONESOURCE Transfer PricingSupernomial t0, TPGenieagainst: Exactera Transfer Pricing, One Source, Sovos Transfer PricingTPGenieagainst: Alteryx Designer, BlackLine Intercompany Hub, Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Transfer Pricing
Two alternatives
Aibidia, CommendaTwo alternatives
Intercompany Corporate®, Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Transfer Pricing DocumenterNine alternatives
Aibidia, Bloomberg Tax Transfer Pricing, Integral, Intercompany.io, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP Transfer Price Management / S/4HANA, Sovos Transfer Pricing, TPGenie, insightsoftware Longview Transfer PricingOne alternative
Gather.nexusOne alternative
Sovos Transfer PricingBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 22:53 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 23:16 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 23:18 | yes | 16 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 22:55 | yes | 22 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 23:00 | yes | 20 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 22:44 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 23:25 | yes | 20 | 53 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 22:19 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 22:18 | yes | 10 | 36 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 22:45 | yes | 13 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 22:51 | yes | 23 | 49 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 22:48 | yes | 14 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 23:07 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-04 22:14 | yes | 12 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 22:27 | yes | 16 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 23:11 | yes | 2 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 22:35 | yes | 18 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 23:26 | yes | 16 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 22:33 | yes | 22 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 23:07 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 23:01 | yes | 22 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 23:00 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 22:35 | yes | 5 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 22:57 | yes | 25 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 23:18 | yes | 10 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 23:04 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 22:39 | yes | 3 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-04 22:17 | yes | 15 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 22:27 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 22:18 | yes | 7 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 23:19 | yes | 23 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 23:10 | yes | 35 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 23:07 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 22:15 | yes | 22 | 14 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 23:26 | yes | 24 | 59 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 22:17 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 23:04 | yes | 12 | 28 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 23:07 | yes | 20 | 29 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 22:53 | yes | 25 | 323 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 22:50 | yes | 8 | 15 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 22:52 | yes | 7 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-04 22:46 | yes | 22 | 38 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 23:00 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 22:45 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 22:20 | yes | 16 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 22:44 | yes | 21 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 23:20 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 22:24 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 22:40 | yes | 23 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 23:05 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 23:19 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 23:20 | yes | 21 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 23:16 | yes | 19 | 76 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 22:27 | yes | 17 | 39 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 23:19 | yes | 2 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-04 23:14 | yes | 21 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 23:00 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 22:58 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 22:44 | yes | 13 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 23:02 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 22:27 | yes | 13 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 23:25 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 23:14 | yes | 20 | 44 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 23:21 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 22:50 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 22:31 | yes | 14 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 23:01 | yes | 13 | 38 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 23:13 | no | 0 | 48 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 23:21 | yes | 3 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-04 22:20 | yes | 11 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 22:57 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 22:22 | yes | 4 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 22:41 | yes | 23 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 22:56 | yes | 23 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 22:23 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 23:23 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 22:14 | yes | 23 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 23:05 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 23:07 | yes | 18 | 35 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 22:16 | yes | 25 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 22:20 | yes | 12 | 38 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 22:54 | yes | 20 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 23:01 | yes | 4 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-04 22:37 | yes | 19 | 27 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Bloomberg Tax read as Bloomberg Tax Transfer Pricing
Bloomberg Tax TP read as Bloomberg Tax Transfer Pricing
Exactera read as Exactera Transfer Pricing
Exactera (Thomson Reuters) read as Exactera Transfer Pricing
Exactera (formerly CrossBorder Solutions) read as Exactera Transfer Pricing
Exactera (formerly XBS) read as Exactera Transfer Pricing
Longview read as Longview Tax
Longview (insightsoftware) read as Longview Tax
ONESOURCE read as ONESOURCE Transfer Pricing
ONESOURCE (Thomson Reuters) read as ONESOURCE Transfer Pricing
PlaidCloud read as PlaidCloud Operational Transfer Pricing
SAP read as SAP S/4HANA
Sovos read as Sovos Transfer Pricing
Sovos (Taxify) read as Sovos Transfer Pricing
Thomson Reuters read as Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE
Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik (Operational Transfer Pricing) read as CCH Tagetik
Unresolved, counted raw
Alteryx Designer
ArmsLengthAI Tools
Axiobench
CCH Transfer Pricing
Capgemini TP Catalyst
EY Serafim
EY TP Doc Solution
Egnyte
Intercompany Software (Intercompany Corporate Edition)
Intra Pricing Solutions
KPMG-style advisory-led solutions
Maven: Transfer Pricing
Oracle Taxation
Quantera Global
Ryan Transfer Pricing (formerly ONESOURCE Transfer Pricing)
SAP BTM
SAP Business Technology Platform (BTP)
SAP TP
SAP Transfer Price Management / S/4HANA
SAP modules
SoftPro
Sovos TP
Spherion
Supernomial (t0 / TP Warehouse)
Supernomial t0
The Zanders Transfer Pricing Suite
Transfer Pricing Toolkit
Transplace
Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik Operational Transfer Pricing
Wolters Kluwig CCH
Zanders Group
insightsoftware Longview Transfer Pricing
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
Follow Transfer pricing
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this category moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.