Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Jira · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Jira

6Judge labels

0First choices

3Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Jira was named 2 times in Corporate performance ma and 1 other category, where Planful led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market41 of 95

under the label threshold

Enterprise36 of 68

under the label threshold

In corporate performance ma · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Jira for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Corporate performance management	Planning and analysis	0%	41 of 95	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Planful at 29%
Financial reporting and dashboards	Planning and analysis	0%	76 of 133	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Jira yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Jira across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Jira Enterprise is the definitive choice for agile/DevOps teams needing advanced governance and multi‑site support.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Corporate performance ma · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Jira, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Jira was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

ClickUp5 of 60Not in the top three

Asana4 of 60Not in the top three

Monday.com4 of 60Not in the top three

Wrike3 of 61Not in the top three

Smartsheet3 of 60Not in the top three

Celoxis2 of 60Not in the top three

Hive2 of 60Not in the top three

Microsoft Excel2 of 60Not in the top three

Microsoft Power BI2 of 60Not in the top three

Notion2 of 60Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Jira. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 6 answers that named Jira and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

thedigitalprojectmanager.com4

ones.com3

wrike.com3

forbes.com2

teamwork.com2

technologyadvice.com2

techrepublic.com2

atlassian.com1

basedash.com1

berrydunn.com1

Twenty-one of the twenty-one domain citations in answers naming Jira came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/enterprise-project-management-software2

thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/enterprise-project-portfolio-management-software2

wrike.com/blog/enterprise-project-management-software2

atlassian.com/work-management/project-management/solutions1

basedash.com/blog/best-automated-reporting-tools-compared-20261

berrydunn.com/news-detail/four-questions-you-must-answer-before-purchasing-large-software-1

biclaw.app/blog/business-intelligence-tools-smb1

businessmodelanalyst.com/business-model-canvas-maker1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Jira

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Jira; a claim can dispute any of them.

Jira Enterprise 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Jira's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Jira, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at jira.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.