4 categories · Named, not rankedAsana
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial close management | Accounting and close | 0% | 57 of 68 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 60% |
| Board and investor reporting | Planning and analysis | 0% | 63 of 97 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by OnBoard at 25% |
| Corporate performance management | Planning and analysis | 0% | 34 of 95 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Planful at 29% |
| Financial reporting and dashboards | Planning and analysis | 0% | 64 of 133 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 27% |
Movement
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Asana excels for teams that want a clean, goal‑oriented workflow with relatively quick adoption.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Corporate performance ma · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Checklist-only or basic trackers (e.g., generic project tools like Asana/Monday.com repurposed for closes)... Avoid if” Grok 4.1 Fast · Financial close manageme · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 17 answers that named Asana and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
Thirty-nine of the thirty-nine domain citations in answers naming Asana came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Asana's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Asana, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at asana.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.