Every category where a model named I'mBoard for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Board and investor reporting	Planning and analysis	2%	18 of 97	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by OnBoard at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for I'mBoard yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated I'mBoard across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labels2

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 label1not counted in share

Budget-constrained5 labels3

Scale-constrained2 labels1

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Go with I'mBoard if you are a fast-moving, tech-forward startup that wants AI-driven meeting prep and minutes.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Board · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as I'mBoard, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and I'mBoard was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

BoardPro9 of 120Not in the top three

Boardable7 of 121Not in the top three

Diligent7 of 120Not in the top three

Nasdaq Boardvantage7 of 120Not in the top three

OnBoard5 of 120Not in the top three

Notion4 of 120Not in the top three

Diligent Boards3 of 121Not in the top three

BoardBreeze3 of 120Not in the top three

Fathom3 of 120Not in the top three

AppDeck Board Portal2 of 120Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named I'mBoard. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 12 answers that named I'mBoard and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

imboard.aiYour site8

appdeck.com6

board-room.org6

capterra.com5

clearpointstrategy.com5

g2.com5

guideflow.com5

zipdo.co4

boardpro.com3

kurums.com3

Forty-two of the fifty domain citations in answers naming I'mBoard came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

appdeck.com/blog/board-reporting-software-comparison6

appdeck.com/blog/board-portal-software-comparison-20265

clearpointstrategy.com/blog/board-reporting-software5

guideflow.com/blog/board-management-software5

imboard.ai/blog/best-board-management-software-for-startups5

board-room.org/blog/board-reporting-software4

zipdo.co/best/board-reporting-software4

board-room.org/3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when I'mBoard's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as I'mBoard, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at imboard.ai is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.