7 categories · RankedLiveFlow
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial consolidation | Accounting and close | 2% | 8 of 96 | 0% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 19% |
| FP&A platforms | Planning and analysis | 0% | 17 of 52 | 10% | 10 | accepted challenger |
| Financial reporting and dashboards | Planning and analysis | 0% | 29 of 133 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 27% |
| Financial modeling and scenario planning | Planning and analysis | 0% | 22 of 114 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Datarails at 19% |
| Board and investor reporting | Planning and analysis | 0% | 50 of 97 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by OnBoard at 25% |
| Corporate performance management | Planning and analysis | 0% | 42 of 95 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Planful at 29% |
| Financial close management | Accounting and close | 0% | 43 of 68 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 60% |
Movement
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you want the single best answer for a tight budget, I'd say LiveFlow for simplicity and cost” GPT-5.4 mini · Financial consolidation · budget prompt · first choice
“lighter tools like LiveFlow or Cube integrate with QuickBooks/Excel to generate financial reports at a lower cost” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Board · budget prompt · alternative
“worth a look if you want live financial reporting and forecasting with a spreadsheet-friendly workflow” GPT-5.4 mini · FP&A platforms · budget prompt · alternative
“Joiin/LiveFlow if you mainly need faster reporting and lightweight multi-entity consolidation” Perplexity Sonar · Financial consolidation · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“It is significantly more expensive than Coefficient and still requires you to work inside spreadsheets.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · FP&A platforms · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 72 of the 94 answers that named LiveFlow and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
235 of the 252 domain citations in answers naming LiveFlow came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as LiveFlow
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LiveFlow's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LiveFlow, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at liveflow.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.