Index › Products › Juspay Hyperswitch · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Juspay Hyperswitch

11Judge labels

4First choices

1Negative labels

6 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Juspay Hyperswitch was named 3 times in Payment orchestration, where BlueSnap led with 18%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business7 of 83

under the label threshold

Mid-market12 of 81

under the label threshold

Enterprise23 of 63

under the label threshold

In payment orchestration · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Juspay Hyperswitch for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Payment orchestration platforms	Receivables and billing	4%	12 of 81	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by BlueSnap at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Juspay Hyperswitch yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Juspay Hyperswitch across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 label1not counted in share

Budget-constrained7 labels4

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“the best payment orchestration platform for a company with a limited budget is Juspay Hyperswitch” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Payment orchestration · budget prompt · first choice

“If you have dev resources and want near-zero software cost → self-hosted Hyperswitch.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Payment orchestration · budget prompt · first choice

“Juspay Hyperswitch (open-source, self-hostable)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Payment orchestration · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Juspay Hyperswitch, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Juspay Hyperswitch was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Gr4vy10 of 112Not among the top eight

Primer9 of 110Not among the top eight

Spreedly8 of 112Not among the top eight

Adyen7 of 110Not among the top eight

IXOPAY5 of 110Not among the top eight

Solidgate5 of 110Not among the top eight

Stripe4 of 110Not among the top eight

Corefy3 of 112Not among the top eight

BlueSnap2 of 110Not among the top eight

Braintree2 of 110Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Juspay Hyperswitch. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 11 answers that named Juspay Hyperswitch and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com11

whop.com11

startupstash.com9

paymend.com7

devopsschool.com5

dodopayments.com5

fitsmallbusiness.com5

itechguides.com5

sourceforge.net5

thecfoclub.com5

No domain is on file for Juspay Hyperswitch, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/payment-orchestration-software11

startupstash.com/top-payment-orchestration9

whop.com/blog/payment-orchestration-platforms8

paymend.com/blog/15-payment-orchestration-platforms-by-category7

devopsschool.com/blog/top-10-payment-orchestration-platforms-features-pros-cons-comparison5

dodopayments.com/blogs/payment-orchestration-platforms5

fitsmallbusiness.com/payment-orchestration5

thecfoclub.com/tools/best-payment-orchestration-platform5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Juspay Hyperswitch stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 30 a month (“juspay hyperswitch”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 2 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 12 of 81 in payment orchestration

Segment leader

18%

BlueSnap

First choices: 4 across its categories
Named in: 11 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Juspay Hyperswitch

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Juspay Hyperswitch's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Juspay Hyperswitch, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Juspay Hyperswitch by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Juspay Hyperswitch is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Juspay Hyperswitch, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.