Every category where a model named Solidgate for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Payment orchestration platforms	Receivables and billing	6%	5 of 81	4%	27	accepted challenger
Chargeback management	Receivables and billing	0%	72 of 81	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Chargeflow at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Solidgate yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Solidgate across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	2	1	0	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	2	0	4
Mistral Small	1	2	0	0	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	2	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	3	0	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	1	1	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	0	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1	0	2
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	1	1	0	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct13 labels3

Paraphrase8 labelsNone

Comparative21 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained7 labels2

Scale-constrained4 labels1

Negative10 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative63 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Solidgate and BlueSnap are top choices due to their robust feature sets, B2B specialization, and ease of integration” Mistral Small · Payment orchestration · direct prompt · first choice

“Solidgate is the most commonly cited mid-market option today” Muse Glimmer 30B · Payment orchestration · direct prompt · first choice

“Solidgate or Yuno for all-in-one simplicity” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Payment orchestration · direct prompt · first choice

“Solidgate is best overall for complex orchestration stacks, offering payments plus billing, vault, and fraud in one suite.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Payment orchestration · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Limited review volume: Only 3 reviews on Trustpilot (3.3/5 rating)... Insufficient validation” Kimi K2 · Payment orchestration · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Solidgate, over the 63 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Solidgate was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Spreedly43 of 638Compare →

Primer39 of 634Compare →

Corefy31 of 632Not among the top eight

Gr4vy27 of 633Compare →

IXOPAY23 of 633Not among the top eight

Yuno23 of 632Compare →

Adyen21 of 634Compare →

BlueSnap20 of 635Compare →

Stripe16 of 632Not among the top eight

Checkout.com13 of 631Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Solidgate. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 63 of the 63 answers that named Solidgate and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com51

whop.com50

solidgate.comYour site36

ilounge.com33

dodopayments.com27

devopsschool.com24

paymend.com22

corefy.com21

chargeback.io20

techrepublic.com20

268 of the 304 domain citations in answers naming Solidgate came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/payment-orchestration-software49

whop.com/blog/payment-orchestration-platforms40

ilounge.com/articles/10-best-payment-orchestration-platforms-in-202633

solidgate.com/blog/best-payment-orchestration-platforms28

dodopayments.com/blogs/payment-orchestration-platforms27

devopsschool.com/blog/top-10-payment-orchestration-platforms-features-pros-cons-comparison23

paymend.com/blog/15-payment-orchestration-platforms-by-category22

chargeback.io/blog/best-payment-orchestration-platforms19

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

solidgate.com ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Solidgate takes 6% of first choices and BlueSnap takes 18%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “payment orchestration platform”

Position for “payment orchestration platforms”

Searches for its name, Google: 1,600 a month (“solidgate”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 117 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 53,439 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 5,091 · 476 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 2,083
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 5 of 81 in payment orchestration

Segment leader

18%

BlueSnap

First choices: 6 across its categories
Named in: 63 answers
Its own site cited: in 63 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on solidgate.com

703

subdomains included

Content

481

counted in the table below

Documentation

178

Product · Integration

3 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days
Glossary or explainer	233	undated
Blog	177	undated
Comparison	50	undated
Case study	13	undated
Report or ebook	7	undated
Template or tool	1	undated

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page solidgate.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Solidgate

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Solidgate; a claim can dispute any of them.

SolidGate 1

Follow Solidgate

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Solidgate is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Payment orchestration platform for global scale
solidgate.com
For: Global companies; fast-growing online businesses selling globally – spanning subscriptions, cross-border e-commerce, SaaS, marketplaces, and digital businesses
solidgate.com
Price stated: pricing is based on transaction volume rather than a flat monthly fee solidgate.com
Certifications: PCI DSS 4.0 compliance
Customers named: BoltAjax SystemsBetterMeDMarketDRESSXHeadwayHiggsfieldHOLYWATER
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What Solidgate's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: solidgate.com, solidgate.com/solutions/saas, solidgate.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Solidgate's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Solidgate, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Solidgate by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Solidgate is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Solidgate, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.