AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Konsolidat · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

Konsolidat

2Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Konsolidat was named 2 times in Financial consolidation and 1 other category, where Prophix led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In financial consolidation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Konsolidat for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Financial consolidationAccounting and close2%17 of 1020%1under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 24%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
Corporate performance managementPlanning and analysis0%41 of 990%1under 10 labels · led by Planful at 22%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, Konsolidat held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · Financial consolidation · by segment

Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 17 of 99, unchanged

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Financial consolidation0%2%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.New this editionRank 17 of 102, unchanged
Corporate performance ma0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 41 of 99, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Konsolidat across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX10001
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you want to avoid any monthly cost and have technical resources: Go with Konsolidat (MIT‑licensed, self‑hosted).” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Financial consolidation · budget prompt · first choice
“Basic reporting/consolidation on free tier for very small teams. | Limited features on free” Grok 4.1 Fast · Corporate performance ma · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Konsolidat, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Konsolidat was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Cube2 of 21Not among the top eight
Vena2 of 20Not among the top eight
Abacum1 of 20Not among the top eight
Acterys1 of 20Not among the top eight
Anaplan1 of 20Not among the top eight
DOKKA1 of 20Not among the top eight
Datarails1 of 20Not among the top eight
ERPNext1 of 20Not among the top eight
Fathom1 of 20Not among the top eight
Google Sheets1 of 20Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Konsolidat. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named Konsolidat and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

itechguides.com2
thecfoclub.com2
abacum.ai1
bluecopa.com1
consolidate.io1
cubesoftware.com1
cybersecuritynews.com1
datarails.com1
fathomhq.com1
fueler.io1

Twelve of the twelve domain citations in answers naming Konsolidat came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on konsolidat.com
90
subdomains included
Content
21
counted in the table below
Documentation
62
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Comparison11undated
Blog9undatedFinancial consolidation, Corporate performance ma
Glossary or explainer1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page konsolidat.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Konsolidat

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Konsolidat; a claim can dispute any of them.
Konsolidat (MIT‑licensed, self‑hosted) 1

Follow Konsolidat

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Konsolidat is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Open-source EPM for SAP & Microsoft Dynamics. Excel-native consolidation, allocation & planning — no license fees, full source.
For
Enterprise groups — 10 to 500 finance users — running SAP or Microsoft Dynamics, with genuine consolidation complexity and a finance team that deserves better tooling.
Price stated
Konsolidat is MIT open source. Self-host it for zero license cost, run a fixed-scope pilot to prove it on your numbers, or let us host and operate it for you. konsolidat.com
Starting price
0 konsolidat.com
Free plan or trial
The self-hosted edition has no license fee under MIT. konsolidat.com
Integrations claimed
2 konsolidat.com
Not stated on the pages read
Certifications, hosting, customers

What Konsolidat's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: konsolidat.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Konsolidat's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Konsolidat, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Konsolidat by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Konsolidat is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Konsolidat, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at konsolidat.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.