6 categories · RankedERPNext
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERP systems | Accounting and close | 11% | 5 of 70 | 6% | 16 | accepted challenger |
| Financial consolidation | Accounting and close | 2% | 12 of 96 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 19% |
| Supplier management | Spend and procurement | 2% | 13 of 80 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Procurify at 26% |
| Corporate performance management | Planning and analysis | 0% | 83 of 95 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Planful at 29% |
| Fixed asset accounting | Accounting and close | 0% | 47 of 94 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Fixed Assets at 29% |
| Procure-to-pay | Spend and procurement | 0% | 35 of 85 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Procurify at 45% |
Movement
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose ERPNext if you want a complete, 100% free ERP (no paywalled features) and have someone on your team who understands basic software deployment/hosting.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ERP systems · budget prompt · first choice
“ERPNext is the standout here. It is the only truly free option that handles multi-company consolidation” Kimi K2 · Financial consolidation · budget prompt · first choice
“Choose Open-Source (ERPNext/Odoo) if: You have internal IT resources to host and maintain” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Supplier management · budget prompt · first choice
“Start with ERPNext if you have basic IT skills and want maximum cost savings” GLM 4.7 FlashX · ERP systems · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Odoo / ERPNext: These open-source or open-core systems... rendering the system unstable” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ERP systems · negative prompt · soft negative
“free community edition), but they require dev setup—not plug-and-play” Grok 4.1 Fast · Corporate performance ma · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 52 of the 63 answers that named ERPNext and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
203 of the 203 domain citations in answers naming ERPNext came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ERPNext's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ERPNext, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at erpnext.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.