Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Lattice · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Lattice

14Judge labels

0First choices

2Negative labels

10 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

6 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Lattice was named 6 times in Corporate performance ma and 1 other category, where Planful led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business35 of 88

under the label threshold

Mid-market27 of 95

under the label threshold

Enterprise17 of 68

under the label threshold

In corporate performance ma · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Lattice for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Corporate performance management	Planning and analysis	0%	27 of 95	20%	5	under 10 labels · led by Planful at 29%
Board and investor reporting	Planning and analysis	0%	73 of 97	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by OnBoard at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Lattice yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Lattice across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase11 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“if your focus is more on employee performance management and OKRs ... then Lattice would be the better choice” MiniMax M2.5 · Corporate performance ma · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“a polished performance management platform that is best for mid-market organizations” Llama 4 Maverick · Corporate performance ma · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Lattice could be a strong alternative” Mistral Small · Corporate performance ma · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid HR-focused "performance management" tools (e.g., Lattice)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Corporate performance ma · paraphrase prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Lattice, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Lattice was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Anaplan7 of 142Not in the top three

Workday Adaptive Planning7 of 141Not in the top three

Betterworks6 of 142Not in the top three

15Five6 of 140Not in the top three

Planful4 of 142Not in the top three

OneStream4 of 141Not in the top three

Vena4 of 141Not in the top three

SAP SuccessFactors4 of 140Not in the top three

Cube3 of 141Not in the top three

Prophix3 of 141Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Lattice. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 14 answers that named Lattice and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learn.g2.com8

betterworks.com6

forbes.com6

peoplegoal.com6

peoplemanagingpeople.com6

workhuman.com6

defactoglobal.com5

effy.ai5

hrtechsaas.com5

okrstool.com5

Fifty-eight of the fifty-eight domain citations in answers naming Lattice came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-corporate-performance-management-software8

betterworks.com/magazine/best-performance-management-software6

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-performance-management-software6

defactoglobal.com/blog/best-corporate-performance-management-software5

hrtechsaas.com/blog/best-performance-management-software-mid-market5

okrstool.com/blog/performance-management-software5

peoplegoal.com/blog/corporate-performance-management-software5

workhuman.com/blog/best-performance-management-software5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Lattice

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Lattice; a claim can dispute any of them.

Lattice/15Five 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Lattice's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Lattice, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at lattice.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.