Every category where a model named OneStream for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Corporate tax provision	Tax and compliance	5%	7 of 98	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Tax Provision at 26%
Financial consolidation	Accounting and close	0%	19 of 96	39%	36	criticized challenger
Corporate performance management	Planning and analysis	0%	18 of 95	31%	29	criticized challenger
Financial close management	Accounting and close	0%	12 of 68	25%	20	criticized challenger
FP&A platforms	Planning and analysis	0%	22 of 52	31%	13	criticized challenger
Account reconciliation	Accounting and close	0%	21 of 72	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 33%
Financial reporting and dashboards	Planning and analysis	0%	99 of 133	33%	3	under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for OneStream yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated OneStream across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	6	0	7
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	5	1	7
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	2	0	6	9
Perplexity Sonar	3	1	4	3	11
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	10	5	17
Mistral Small	2	1	3	1	7
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	3	2	4	11
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	4	0	5
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	5	1	3	11
Kimi K2	0	2	4	5	11
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	5	2	3	10
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	4	2	8

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct79 labels19

Paraphrase54 labels15

Comparative110 labels25not counted in share

Budget-constrained74 labels22

Scale-constrained46 labels4

Negative60 labels7not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative423 labels in all, every segment counted; 60 of the 92 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you need *audited financial statements* across legal entities, you want a financial consolidation tool (OneStream, CCH Tagetik, Prophix)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Financial consolidation · comparative prompt · first choice

“the safest recommendation from the available results is OneStream ... it is specifically called out as the lower-cost entry option” Perplexity Sonar · Corporate tax provision · budget prompt · first choice

“Strong all-in-one CPM platform for consolidation plus close, with governed workflows and traceable calculations.” Perplexity Sonar · Financial consolidation · comparative prompt · first choice

“OneStream - Top pick for enterprises; unifies consolidation, planning, reporting, and close in one platform.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Financial consolidation · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“you should likely avoid the high-end enterprise giants (like *OneStream* or *Oracle FCCS*) due to implementation complexity and heavy cost” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial consolidation · scale prompt · hard negative

“the key is to avoid enterprise-grade corporate performance management (CPM) suites (like OneStream, Oracle Cloud EPM, or CCH Tagetik)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial consolidation · budget prompt · hard negative

“Avoid large enterprise platforms like Anaplan or OneStream if budget is the main constraint” Perplexity Sonar · Corporate performance ma · budget prompt · hard negative

“typically start at $50,000–$400,000+/year ... Avoid these if you have a limited budget.” Kimi K2 · Financial consolidation · budget prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as OneStream, over the 423 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and OneStream was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Anaplan204 of 42331Not in the top three

Workday Adaptive Planning177 of 4239Not in the top three

BlackLine136 of 42355Not in the top three

Vena136 of 42312Not in the top three

Planful133 of 4237Not in the top three

Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM131 of 42310Not in the top three

CCH Tagetik110 of 4231Not in the top three

Pigment91 of 42314Not in the top three

Workiva82 of 4235Not in the top three

FloQast77 of 42311Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named OneStream. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 355 of the 423 answers that named OneStream and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

worldmetrics.org139

cfoshortlist.com123

gartner.com122

drivetrain.ai109

highradius.com99

prophix.com99

learn.g2.com86

onestream.comYour site86

cubesoftware.com74

numeric.io72

923 of the 1,009 domain citations in answers naming OneStream came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

drivetrain.ai/solutions/enterprise-performance-management-software62

gartner.com/reviews/market/financial-close-and-consolidation-solutions57

prophix.com/blog/the-12-best-financial-consolidation-software-tools-for-fp-a-teams53

numeric.io/blog/financial-close-software51

fathomhq.com/blog/the-6-best-financial-consolidation-software-solutions-in-202446

highradius.com/resources/Blog/best-financial-consolidation-vendors46

learn.g2.com/best-financial-close-software43

board.com/guide/best-fpa-software-for-enterprises41

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as OneStream

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as OneStream; a claim can dispute any of them.

OneStream Software 2OneStream (Tax Provision) 1OneStream - Unified EPM 1OneStream / Planful 1OneStream/SAP 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when OneStream's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as OneStream, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at onestream.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.