AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Lightyear.ai · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Lightyear.ai

4Judge labels
2First choices
0Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Lightyear.ai was named 1 time in Telecom expense mgmt, where Genuity led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In telecom expense mgmt · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Lightyear.ai for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Telecom expense managementSpend and procurement2%15 of 890%1under 10 labels · led by Genuity at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Lightyear.ai yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Lightyear.ai across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash10001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 label1
Paraphrase2 labels1
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best Overall Modern Solution: Lightyear.ai ... currently the strongest recommendation for mid-sized companies” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Telecom expense mgmt · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Lightyear.ai, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Lightyear.ai was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Tangoe One Telecom4 of 40Not among the top eight
vCom Solutions3 of 41Not among the top eight
Calero3 of 40Not among the top eight
Expensify3 of 40Not among the top eight
Ramp3 of 40Not among the top eight
Brex2 of 40Not among the top eight
Sakon2 of 40Not among the top eight
Clearview1 of 41Not among the top eight
Datagate1 of 41Not among the top eight
GoGenuity1 of 41Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Lightyear.ai. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named Lightyear.ai and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

lightyear.aiYour site4
trustradius.com3
use.expensify.com3
gartner.com2
gogenuity.com2
gtiadvisors.com2
insight.tmcnet.com2
mindglobal.com2
motus.com2
paylinedata.com2

Twenty of the twenty-four domain citations in answers naming Lightyear.ai came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

lightyear.ai ranks 4 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Lightyear.ai takes 2% of first choices and Genuity takes 19%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “telecom expense management platform”
4
Position for “telecom expense management platforms”
7
Organic visits to its site
about 33,552 a month
Searches its site ranks for
9,609 · 356 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,853
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
42 ads · 39 text, 3 video · 22 shown in the last 30 days

First shown June 2022, as Lightyear AI Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 28 in the year, 14 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 15 of 89 in telecom expense mgmt
Segment leader
19%
Genuity
First choices
2 across its categories
Named in
4 answers
Its own site cited
in 4 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on lightyear.ai
2,213
subdomains included
Content
584
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
27 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Glossary or explainer241undatedExpense management, Telecom expense mgmt
Blog165undatedExpense management, Telecom expense mgmt
Comparison134undated
Webinar or virtual event18undated
Case study14undated
Report or ebook7undated
Conference or event5undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page lightyear.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Lightyear.ai

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Lightyear.ai is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The first agentic platform for enterprise telecom; "Telecom’s system of action" that brings telecom data, workflows, and AI agents together to automate work across the lifecycle.
For
enterprises
Customers named
EveronOktaAlo YogaBig-D ConstructionElauwitAeconMSA SafetyCampus Technologies
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Lightyear.ai's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: lightyear.ai, lightyear.ai/solutions/wan, lightyear.ai/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Lightyear.ai's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Lightyear.ai, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Lightyear.ai by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Lightyear.ai is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Lightyear.ai, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at lightyear.ai is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.