Every category where a model named LivePlan for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Financial modeling and scenario planning	Planning and analysis	2%	16 of 114	25%	4	under 10 labels · led by Datarails at 19%
Cash flow forecasting	Treasury and cash	0%	38 of 86	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Agicap at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for LivePlan yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated LivePlan across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	0	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labelsNone

Paraphrase6 labels3

Comparative9 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained7 labels3

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative4 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative31 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you want the safest recommendation without more details, choose LivePlan for a limited budget and basic financial modeling needs.” Perplexity Sonar · Financial modeling · budget prompt · first choice

“Small, entrepreneurial team wanting monthly narrative forecast | LivePlan” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Cash flow forecasting · comparative prompt · alternative

“LivePlan is widely considered the top choice for startups and SMEs” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Financial modeling · budget prompt · alternative

“Try LivePlan or Finmark.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Financial modeling · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“$15–30/month (annual) | ... If budget allows ~$180/year” Grok 4.1 Fast · Financial modeling · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as LivePlan, over the 31 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LivePlan was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Fathom21 of 313Not in the top three

Cube12 of 312Not in the top three

Microsoft Excel8 of 312Not in the top three

Jirav8 of 311Not in the top three

Anaplan8 of 310Not in the top three

Float7 of 313Not in the top three

Microsoft Power BI6 of 311Not in the top three

Google Sheets5 of 312Not in the top three

Brixx5 of 310Not in the top three

Finmark5 of 310Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LivePlan. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 27 of the 31 answers that named LivePlan and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

worldmetrics.org14

cubesoftware.com13

fathomhq.com13

gitnux.org10

autymate.com9

zipdo.co8

datarails.com7

farseer.com7

g2.com7

liveplan.comYour site7

Eighty-eight of the ninety-five domain citations in answers naming LivePlan came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

autymate.com/blog/best-financial-modeling-software-in-2026-top-10-tools-with-pricing9

fathomhq.com/blog/the-6-best-financial-modelling-software-tools9

cubesoftware.com/blog/financial-modeling-software7

datarails.com/best-financial-modeling-software6

clockwork.ai/blog/best-fpa-software-small-business4

drivetrain.ai/solutions/financial-modeling-software4

farseer.com/blog/financial-modeling-tools4

liveplan.com/features/financial-forecasts-and-scenarios4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LivePlan's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LivePlan, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at liveplan.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.