Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer

2Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

2 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer was named 1 time in Internal controls, where AuditBoard led with 18%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business49 of 113

under the label threshold

Mid-market44 of 71

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In internal controls · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Internal controls and SOX	Tax and compliance	0%	44 of 71	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by AuditBoard at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Supplement with ManageEngine's free trial for IT log management needs” Kimi K2 · Internal controls · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Mitti2 of 22Not in the top three

Complies.ai1 of 21Not in the top three

Envelop1 of 20Not in the top three

Protecht Group1 of 20Not in the top three

RiskWatch1 of 20Not in the top three

Site24x71 of 20Not in the top three

Sprinto1 of 20Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

complies.ai2

itprc.com2

mitti.com2

netwrix.com2

pathlock.com2

riskpublishing.com2

worldmetrics.org2

checkthat.ai1

exabeam.com1

planetcompliance.com1

Seventeen of the seventeen domain citations in answers naming ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

complies.ai/blog/best-sox-compliance-software2

itprc.com/sox-compliance-software2

mitti.com/apps/sox-compliance-software2

netwrix.com/en/resources/blog/sox-compliance-software2

pathlock.com/the-19-best-sox-compliance-software-solutions2

riskpublishing.com/best-sox-compliance-software-compared2

checkthat.ai/answers/what-are-the-best-tools-for-sarbanes-oxley-act-compliance1

complies.ai/sox-compliance-software1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at manageengine.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.