Every category where a model named Mitti for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Internal controls and SOX	Tax and compliance	9%	4 of 71	0%	8	under 10 labels · led by AuditBoard at 18%
Fixed asset accounting	Accounting and close	0%	57 of 94	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Sage Fixed Assets at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Mitti yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Mitti across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	3	3
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labels1

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained15 labels6

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you can only buy one tool to make an impact, go with Mitti for the overarching visibility and policy management.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Internal controls · budget prompt · first choice

“For the most budget-friendly options, Mitti and Complies stand out due to their low cost and ease of use.” Mistral Small · Internal controls · budget prompt · first choice

“Mitti by SafetyCulture ⭐ Best Value ... Start with Mitti's free tier (up to 10 users)” Kimi K2 · Internal controls · budget prompt · first choice

“Mitti (free for up to 10 users) - Best for basic compliance” MiniMax M2.5 · Internal controls · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Mitti, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mitti was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Drata11 of 232Not in the top three

Workiva11 of 230Not in the top three

Complies.ai10 of 237Not in the top three

AuditBoard10 of 231Not in the top three

Vanta9 of 231Not in the top three

Hyperproof6 of 231Not in the top three

LogicGate Risk Cloud4 of 230Not in the top three

Site24x74 of 230Not in the top three

Onspring3 of 231Not in the top three

Sprinto3 of 231Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Mitti. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 19 of the 23 answers that named Mitti and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

mitti.comYour site19

netwrix.com15

worldmetrics.org13

complies.ai12

pathlock.com12

riskpublishing.com11

itprc.com10

optro.ai10

zipdo.co9

exabeam.com7

Ninety-nine of the 118 domain citations in answers naming Mitti came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

mitti.com/apps/sox-compliance-software18

netwrix.com/en/resources/blog/sox-compliance-software15

pathlock.com/the-19-best-sox-compliance-software-solutions12

complies.ai/blog/best-sox-compliance-software11

riskpublishing.com/best-sox-compliance-software-compared11

itprc.com/sox-compliance-software10

optro.ai/blog/best-sox-management-software10

complies.ai/sox-compliance-software8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Mitti

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Mitti; a claim can dispute any of them.

Mitti (by SafetyCulture) 6Mitti by SafetyCulture 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mitti's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mitti, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at mitti.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.