Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › MercuryGate · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

MercuryGate

10Judge labels

2First choices

1Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

7 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. MercuryGate was named 7 times in Treasury management syst, where Trovata led with 18%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business108 of 134

under the label threshold

Mid-market8 of 124

under the label threshold

Enterprise55 of 88

under the label threshold

In treasury management syst · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named MercuryGate for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Treasury management systems	Treasury and cash	5%	8 of 124	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by Trovata at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for MercuryGate yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated MercuryGate across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase10 labels2

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“MercuryGate — Best Overall for Mid-Market ... Start with MercuryGate or 3G TMS” Kimi K2 · Treasury management syst · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“## 1. Top Recommendation: MercuryGate (now a Blue Yonder solution)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Treasury management syst · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Choose MercuryGate if you need a more comprehensive, multi-modal solution and have the resources for deeper implementation.” Mistral Small · Treasury management syst · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“worth considering if your priority is managed transportation rather than a lighter mid-market deployment” Perplexity Sonar · Treasury management syst · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as MercuryGate, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MercuryGate was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

3Gtms4 of 103Not in the top three

FreightPOP4 of 102Not in the top three

Oracle Transportation Management3 of 101Not in the top three

Blue Yonder3 of 100Not in the top three

Blue Yonder Transportation Management2 of 101Not in the top three

Pacejet2 of 101Not in the top three

Cargoson2 of 100Not in the top three

Rose Rocket2 of 100Not in the top three

ShipStation2 of 100Not in the top three

Truckbase2 of 100Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named MercuryGate. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 10 answers that named MercuryGate and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

elevatiq.com8

gartner.com6

gocomet.com6

gofreight.com6

softwareadvice.com6

ratings.freightwaves.com5

suitefleet.com5

worldmetrics.org5

erpresearch.com4

getapp.com4

Fifty-five of the fifty-five domain citations in answers naming MercuryGate came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

elevatiq.com/post/top-tms-systems8

gartner.com/reviews/market/transportation-management-systems6

gocomet.com/blog/top-transportation-management-systems-for-mid-market-businesses6

ratings.freightwaves.com/top-tms-solutions5

softwareadvice.com/scm/transportation-management-software-comparison5

go.mycarrier.io/blog/what-is-the-best-tms-smbs-mid-market4

solutionsreview.com/enterprise-resource-planning/the-best-transportation-management-system4

suitefleet.com/blog/best-tms-system-in-20264

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when MercuryGate's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as MercuryGate, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at mercury.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.