Every category where a model named 3Gtms for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Treasury management systems	Treasury and cash	9%	4 of 124	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by Trovata at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for 3Gtms yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated 3Gtms across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase8 labels4

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“3Gtms is the safest choice for a mid-sized B2B shipper because it is described as purpose-built for shippers” Perplexity Sonar · Treasury management syst · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Choose 3Gtms for a best-in-class mid-market TMS with strong execution and configurability.” Mistral Small · Treasury management syst · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Best Overall for Shipper-First Operations: 3Gtms” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Treasury management syst · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“🏆 Best Overall: 3Gtms” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Treasury management syst · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as 3Gtms, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and 3Gtms was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

FreightPOP4 of 80Not in the top three

MercuryGate4 of 80Not in the top three

Shipwell3 of 80Not in the top three

Oracle Transportation Management2 of 81Not in the top three

MercuryGate TMS1 of 81Not in the top three

Pacejet1 of 81Not in the top three

ShipStation / ShipEngine1 of 81Not in the top three

Alpega1 of 80Not in the top three

BluJay1 of 80Not in the top three

Blue Yonder1 of 80Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named 3Gtms. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 8 answers that named 3Gtms and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

elevatiq.com5

gocomet.com5

gofreight.com5

softwareadvice.com5

erpresearch.com4

g2.com4

gartner.com4

go.mycarrier.io4

suitefleet.com4

getapp.com3

Forty-three of the forty-three domain citations in answers naming 3Gtms came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

elevatiq.com/post/top-tms-systems5

gocomet.com/blog/top-transportation-management-systems-for-mid-market-businesses5

gartner.com/reviews/market/transportation-management-systems4

go.mycarrier.io/blog/what-is-the-best-tms-smbs-mid-market4

gofreight.com/blog/best-tms-software4

softwareadvice.com/scm/transportation-management-software-comparison4

suitefleet.com/blog/best-tms-system-in-20264

supplychaindesk.com/blog/best-tms-software3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when 3Gtms's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as 3Gtms, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at 3gtms.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.