Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Oracle Transportation Management · September 2026 Edition

Oracle · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Oracle Transportation Management

13Judge labels

6First choices

4Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Oracle Transportation Management was named 5 times in Treasury management syst, where Trovata led with 18%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.

Small business126 of 134

under the label threshold

Mid-market114 of 124

under the label threshold

Enterprise2 of 88

under the label threshold

In treasury management syst · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Oracle Transportation Management for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Treasury management systems	Treasury and cash	0%	114 of 124	40%	5	under 10 labels · led by Trovata at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Oracle Transportation Management yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Oracle Transportation Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase11 labels6

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Oracle Transportation Management Cloud are stronger fits, but they tend to make sense when you have more complex global operations” GPT-5.4 mini · Treasury management syst · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Older/Legacy Systems (e.g., some FIS Quantum or Oracle TMS modules): Frequently criticized for clunky interfaces, poor scalability for global ops, and high customization costs.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Treasury management syst · negative prompt · hard negative

“Overkill for mid-market; requires significant IT resources” Kimi K2 · Treasury management syst · paraphrase prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Oracle Transportation Management, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle Transportation Management was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Blue Yonder4 of 130Not in the top three

SAP Transportation Management4 of 130Not in the top three

MercuryGate3 of 131Not in the top three

SAP TM3 of 130Not in the top three

Shipwell2 of 132Not in the top three

FreightPOP2 of 131Not in the top three

GTreasury2 of 131Not in the top three

Kyriba2 of 131Not in the top three

3Gtms2 of 130Not in the top three

E2open2 of 130Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oracle Transportation Management. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 13 answers that named Oracle Transportation Management and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com10

gofreight.com7

elevatiq.com5

softwareadvice.com5

solutionsreview.com5

suitefleet.com5

worldmetrics.org5

g2.com4

guideflow.com4

locus.sh4

Fifty-four of the fifty-four domain citations in answers naming Oracle Transportation Management came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/transportation-management-systems8

gofreight.com/blog/best-tms-software6

elevatiq.com/post/top-tms-systems5

solutionsreview.com/enterprise-resource-planning/the-best-transportation-management-system5

suitefleet.com/blog/best-tms-system-in-20265

guideflow.com/blog/transportation-management-software4

softwareadvice.com/scm/transportation-management-software-comparison4

stfalcon.com/en/blog/post/top-7-tms4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Oracle Transportation Management

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Oracle Transportation Management; a claim can dispute any of them.

Oracle TMS 2Oracle OTM 1Oracle Transportation Management (OTM) 1Oracle Transportation Management Cloud 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oracle Transportation Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oracle Transportation Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at oracle.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.