AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Moody's TP Catalyst · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Moody's TP Catalyst

4Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Moody's TP Catalyst was named 2 times in Transfer pricing, where TPGenie led with 30%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In transfer pricing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Moody's TP Catalyst for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Transfer pricingTax and compliance0%39 of 1010%2under 10 labels · led by TPGenie at 30%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Moody's TP Catalyst yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Moody's TP Catalyst across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna01001
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Need benchmarking/comparable-company analysis? Evaluate Moody's TP Catalyst and RoyaltyRange” GPT-6 Luna · Transfer pricing · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Moody's TP Catalyst, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Moody's TP Catalyst was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Aibidia4 of 42Not among the top eight
TPGenie4 of 41Not among the top eight
CCH Tagetik Operational Transfer Pricing1 of 41Not among the top eight
Bloomberg Tax Transfer Pricing1 of 40Not among the top eight
Exactera Transfer Pricing1 of 40Not among the top eight
Intercompany.io1 of 40Not among the top eight
Longview Transfer Pricing1 of 40Not among the top eight
RoyaltyRange1 of 40Not among the top eight
TPbenchmark1 of 40Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Moody's TP Catalyst. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named Moody's TP Catalyst and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

moodys.comYour site4
aibidia.com3
intrapricing.com3
f6s.com2
getsphere.com2
zipdo.co2
airwallex.com1
cryptoslate.com1
exactera.com1
ey.com1

Sixteen of the twenty domain citations in answers naming Moody's TP Catalyst came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on moodys.com
32,099
subdomains included
Content
10,293
counted in the table below
Documentation
4
Product · Integration
175 · 4
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Report or ebook6,49902023-04-21
Blog1,95202026-02-20
Conference or event1,20412026-09-30
Podcast or video48312026-09-23
News or press10222026-09-24
Case study1602026-05-27
Comparison1402024-10-18
Glossary or explainer1202024-08-29
Webinar or virtual event902023-11-01
Template or tool2undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page moodys.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Moody's TP Catalyst

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Moody's TP Catalyst's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Moody's TP Catalyst, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Moody's TP Catalyst by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Moody's TP Catalyst is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Moody's TP Catalyst, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at moodys.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.