Every category where a model named Mosaic for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Board and investor reporting	Planning and analysis	2%	14 of 97	25%	4	under 10 labels · led by OnBoard at 25%
Financial modeling and scenario planning	Planning and analysis	2%	13 of 114	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by Datarails at 19%
FP&A platforms	Planning and analysis	2%	13 of 52	9%	11	accepted challenger
Financial reporting and dashboards	Planning and analysis	2%	12 of 133	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 27%
Corporate performance management	Planning and analysis	0%	20 of 95	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by Planful at 29%
SaaS metrics and analytics	Planning and analysis	0%	71 of 81	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by ChartMogul at 45%
Cash flow forecasting	Treasury and cash	0%	46 of 86	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Agicap at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Mosaic yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Mosaic across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	4	5	3	0	12
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	3	2	3	8
Llama 4 Maverick	0	2	0	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	1	0	3
Kimi K2	0	3	1	0	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	2	0	4
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	2	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct15 labels2

Paraphrase21 labels5

Comparative16 labelsNone

Budget-constrained5 labelsNone

Scale-constrained12 labelsNone

Negative13 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative82 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you are a growth-stage B2B SaaS company that needs to automate the generation of SaaS/financial metrics for the board deck, choose Mosaic.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Board · direct prompt · first choice

“Go with Mosaic if you are a B2B SaaS/subscription business that wants out-of-the-box tracking of key operational and sales metrics” Gemini 3.5 Flash · FP&A platforms · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Mosaic was built from the ground up for SaaS and B2B business models” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial modeling · direct prompt · first choice

“Mosaic is arguably the strongest out-of-the-box solution” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial reporting · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“What to avoid when budget is tight ... overkill for a budget-conscious company” DeepSeek V4 Flash · FP&A platforms · budget prompt · hard negative

“Expensive (~$1,800/mo) — worth it only for larger SaaS companies that need deep metric reporting” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Board · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

“use Mosaic (if budget allows) which has better data governance—but it's expensive” DeepSeek V4 Flash · SaaS metrics · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Mosaic, over the 82 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mosaic was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Cube55 of 826Not in the top three

Datarails42 of 826Not in the top three

Jirav41 of 821Not in the top three

Vena38 of 823Not in the top three

Workday Adaptive Planning32 of 820Not in the top three

Fathom31 of 829Not in the top three

Planful30 of 823Not in the top three

Anaplan30 of 822Not in the top three

Clockwork27 of 8218Not in the top three

Pigment22 of 823Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Mosaic. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 55 of the 82 answers that named Mosaic and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

drivetrain.ai31

getaleph.com25

golimelight.com25

cubesoftware.com22

clockwork.ai21

learn.g2.com18

cfoshortlist.com13

g2.com13

getfairview.com13

financecopilothq.com11

192 of the 192 domain citations in answers naming Mosaic came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

clockwork.ai/blog/best-fpa-software-small-business21

drivetrain.ai/solutions/financial-planning-analysis-software20

golimelight.com/blog/fpa-software-for-small-business18

getaleph.com/answers/best-fpa-software-by-company-size16

learn.g2.com/best-fpa-software13

getaleph.com/answers/top-fpa-software-202612

cubesoftware.com/blog/best-fpa-software-tools11

financecopilothq.com/best-fpa-software11

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Mosaic

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Mosaic; a claim can dispute any of them.

Mosaic Tech 2Mosaic (now Bob Finance) 1Mosaic Finance 1Mosaic Reports 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mosaic's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mosaic, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at mosaic.tech is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.