Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Multiplye · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Multiplye

5Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Multiplye was named 1 time in ESG and carbon reporting, where Sweep led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business9 of 89

under the label threshold

Mid-market44 of 76

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In esg and carbon reporting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Multiplye for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
ESG and carbon reporting	Equity and corporate	0%	44 of 76	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Sweep at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Multiplye yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Multiplye across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labels1

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Starts at \u20ac0/month with a free trial” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ESG and carbon reporting · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Multiplye, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Multiplye was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

ExecutESG3 of 51Not in the top three

ESG Lift2 of 51Not in the top three

Greenly2 of 51Not in the top three

Sustain.Life2 of 50Not in the top three

CarbonAnalytics1 of 50Not in the top three

CarbonBoard1 of 50Not in the top three

Code Gaia1 of 50Not in the top three

EFRAG Excel Template1 of 50Not in the top three

Emerald Power1 of 50Not in the top three

Esgrid1 of 50Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Multiplye. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named Multiplye and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

f6s.com5

executesg.com4

gartner.com4

coolset.com3

g2.com3

climefy.com2

emissiontwin.com2

esglift.com2

esgsoftwareindex.com2

guideflow.com2

Twenty-nine of the twenty-nine domain citations in answers naming Multiplye came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

executesg.com/resources/blog/esg-software-pricing-20264

f6s.com/software/category/sme-esg-reporting4

gartner.com/reviews/market/esg-management-and-reporting-software4

coolset.com/academy/best-esg-reporting-software-tools3

g2.com/categories/environmental-social-and-governance-esg-reporting/small-business3

climefy.com/blog/top-5-esg-compliance-software2

emissiontwin.com/blog/best-esg-reporting-software2

esgsoftwareindex.com/choosing-esg-platform-pricing2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Multiplye's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Multiplye, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at multiplye.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.