Every category where a model named OFX for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Cross-border payments and FX	Treasury and cash	4%	4 of 83	8%	13	accepted challenger
Expense management	Spend and procurement	0%	29 of 46	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Ramp at 34%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for OFX yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated OFX across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	3	1	0	5
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	1	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase10 labels3

Comparative7 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative6 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative30 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“OFX is excellent if you want a slightly more agile interface with strong personal support” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Cross-border payments · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“For a true "FX hedging + payments" combo in one tool, OFX is my top pick” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Cross-border payments · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Best for Large Transfers + FX Hedging ... If you need simple hedging for large occasional payments: → OFX” Kimi K2 · Cross-border payments · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“High‑value transfers (> $10,000) with dedicated support | OFX, Wise Business, Airwallex” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Cross-border payments · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“OFX or XE Business become competitive only when you reach higher monthly volumes (≥$50k)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Cross-border payments · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as OFX, over the 30 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and OFX was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Wise Business25 of 3012Not in the top three

Airwallex17 of 303Not in the top three

Revolut Business13 of 303Not in the top three

Payoneer11 of 300Not in the top three

PayPal9 of 300Not in the top three

XE Business8 of 300Not in the top three

Stripe7 of 301Not in the top three

XTransfer6 of 300Not in the top three

WorldFirst5 of 301Not in the top three

Adyen5 of 300Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named OFX. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 30 answers that named OFX and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

airwallex.com15

sendmoneycompare.com15

wise.com12

xtransfer.com10

blog.ibanfirst.com8

worldfirst.com8

f6s.com7

guideflow.com6

theindustryleaders.org6

alltopbusiness.com5

Ninety-two of the ninety-two domain citations in answers naming OFX came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

blog.ibanfirst.com/en/fx-risk-management-tools7

f6s.com/software/category/currency-risk-management6

guideflow.com/blog/cross-border-payments-software6

theindustryleaders.org/post/10-best-b2b-cross-border-payment-solutions-ranked-and-reviewed6

xtransfer.com/blog/cross-border-payment-provider-comparison6

f6s.com/software/category/fx-hedging5

ofx.com/en-us/blog/best-expense-management-software-solutions5

payouts.com/best-cross-border-payment-providers5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as OFX

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as OFX; a claim can dispute any of them.

OFX/Corpay 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when OFX's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as OFX, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ofx.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.