Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › OneTrust GRC · September 2026 Edition

OneTrust · 1 category · Named, not ranked

OneTrust GRC

12Judge labels

0First choices

4Negative labels

9 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. OneTrust GRC was named 5 times in Internal controls, where AuditBoard led with 18%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business99 of 113

under the label threshold

Mid-market67 of 71

under the label threshold

Enterprise18 of 65

under the label threshold

In internal controls · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named OneTrust GRC for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Internal controls and SOX	Tax and compliance	0%	67 of 71	60%	5	under 10 labels · led by AuditBoard at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for OneTrust GRC yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated OneTrust GRC across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Strong control testing and deficiency workflows | Enterprise-focused; may be expensive for smaller orgs” Kimi K2 · Internal controls · comparative prompt · alternative

“a strong fit for enterprises needing standardized internal control testing” Llama 4 Maverick · Internal controls · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“ServiceNow GRC / OneTrust / MetricStream – $150k+ per year. Not even in the same universe.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Internal controls · budget prompt · hard negative

“OneTrust starts at $50K+/year for full GRC; HighBond/AuditBoard are more mid-market friendly” MiniMax M2.5 · Internal controls · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

“Overly complex or poorly configured GRC software (e.g., ServiceNow GRC, OneTrust, SAP GRC)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Internal controls · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as OneTrust GRC, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and OneTrust GRC was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

AuditBoard8 of 124Not in the top three

Vanta8 of 121Not in the top three

Diligent One Platform7 of 121Not in the top three

MetricStream7 of 121Not in the top three

ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management7 of 120Not in the top three

Archer6 of 120Not in the top three

Hyperproof6 of 120Not in the top three

LogicGate Risk Cloud6 of 120Not in the top three

Drata5 of 121Not in the top three

SAP GRC4 of 120Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named OneTrust GRC. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 12 answers that named OneTrust GRC and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gitnux.org9

gartner.com7

optro.ai6

sprinto.com4

riskwatch.com3

wifitalents.com3

worldmetrics.org3

diligent.com2

metricstream.com2

riskonnect.com2

Forty-one of the forty-one domain citations in answers naming OneTrust GRC came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gitnux.org/best/internal-controls-management-software8

gartner.com/reviews/market/internal-controls-software7

optro.ai/blog/best-internal-control-management-software6

gitnux.org/best/internal-controls-software5

sprinto.com/blog/internal-control-software4

gitnux.org/best/internal-control-management-software3

gitnux.org/best/internal-control-software3

gartner.com/reviews/market/integrated-risk-management2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as OneTrust GRC

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as OneTrust GRC; a claim can dispute any of them.

OneTrust 3

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when OneTrust GRC's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as OneTrust GRC, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at onetrust.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.