ServiceNow · 1 category · RankedServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal controls and SOX | Tax and compliance | 0% | 69 of 71 | 47% | 15 | criticized challenger |
Movement
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best for: Enterprises already invested in ServiceNow that want controls management tied to their IT service operations.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Internal controls · comparative prompt · alternative
“Organizations already using ServiceNow | Single system of record connecting risk, compliance, and IT operations” Kimi K2 · Internal controls · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for: Enterprises heavily utilizing ServiceNow for IT Service Management (ITSM) and operations.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Internal controls · comparative prompt · alternative
“IT/service management-integrated for operational and ITGC controls.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Internal controls · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“ServiceNow GRC / OneTrust / MetricStream – $150k+ per year. Not even in the same universe.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Internal controls · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid legacy enterprise GRC systems (such as RSA Archer or ServiceNow GRC).” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Internal controls · scale prompt · hard negative
“Tools like these require significant upfront configuration for workflows, taxonomies, and integrations.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Internal controls · negative prompt · soft negative
“heavy enterprise GRC platforms (like MetricStream or ServiceNow) are usually too complex and expensive” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Internal controls · direct prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 42 of the 56 answers that named ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
219 of the 219 domain citations in answers naming ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at servicenow.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.