Every category where a model named Ordway for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Revenue recognition	Accounting and close	4%	8 of 77	0%	11	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Ordway yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Ordway across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	3	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	2	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase5 labels3

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labels1

Scale-constrained7 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If I had to pick one default recommendation for a typical mid-sized B2B company, I'd choose Ordway for the broadest mid-market fit” Perplexity Sonar · Revenue recognition · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Ordway (Best Overall for Mid-Sized Finance Teams)” MiniMax M2.5 · Revenue recognition · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Maxio or Ordway \u2014 Best if you're primarily a subscription / recurring-revenue B2B company” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Revenue recognition · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“lighter tools (Maxio, Ordway, Chargebee, Stripe, Zenskar) better than heavyweight enterprise engines” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Revenue recognition · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Ordway, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Ordway was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

RightRev15 of 232Not in the top three

Maxio14 of 231Not in the top three

Zuora Revenue10 of 234Not in the top three

NetSuite Advanced Revenue Management9 of 230Not in the top three

Sage Intacct8 of 231Not in the top three

BillingPlatform7 of 231Not in the top three

QuickBooks Online6 of 233Not in the top three

Zuora6 of 230Not in the top three

Pipedrive5 of 231Not in the top three

LedgerUp5 of 230Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Ordway. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 23 answers that named Ordway and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

ledgerup.ai14

rightrev.com14

worldmetrics.org13

hubifi.com12

guideflow.com10

pipedrive.com10

getapp.com9

ordwaylabs.comYour site9

dualentry.com7

wise.com7

Ninety-six of the 105 domain citations in answers naming Ordway came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

ledgerup.ai/resources/7-best-revenue-recognition-software-for-saas-202612

guideflow.com/blog/revenue-recognition-software10

ledgerup.ai/resources/best-asc-606-revenue-recognition-software-202610

pipedrive.com/en/blog/best-revenue-recognition-software10

worldmetrics.org/best/revenue-recognition-software9

worldmetrics.org/best/asc-606-revenue-recognition-software8

dualentry.com/blog/best-revenue-recognition-software7

wise.com/us/blog/best-revenue-recognition-software7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Ordway

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Ordway; a claim can dispute any of them.

Ordway Labs 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Ordway's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Ordway, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ordwaylabs.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.