AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Planview Changepoint/AdaptiveWork · October 2026 Edition
Planview · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Planview Changepoint/AdaptiveWork

2Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Planview Changepoint/AdaptiveWork was named 1 time in PSA, where BigTime led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In psa · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Planview Changepoint/AdaptiveWork for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Professional services automationReceivables and billing0%41 of 990%1under 10 labels · led by BigTime at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Planview Changepoint/AdaptiveWork yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Planview Changepoint/AdaptiveWork across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Planview if you need enterprise-scale project portfolio management across hundreds of initiatives” Qwen 3.7 Flash · PSA · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Planview Changepoint/AdaptiveWork, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Planview Changepoint/AdaptiveWork was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Kantata2 of 22Not among the top eight
Birdview PSA1 of 20Not among the top eight
Certinia Professional Services Cloud1 of 20Not among the top eight
ConnectWise PSA1 of 20Not among the top eight
NetSuite OpenAir1 of 20Not among the top eight
Productive1 of 20Not among the top eight
Rocketlane1 of 20Not among the top eight
Scoro1 of 20Not among the top eight
Workday PSA1 of 20Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Planview Changepoint/AdaptiveWork. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named Planview Changepoint/AdaptiveWork and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

kantata.com2
scoro.com2
accelo.com1
assembly.com1
bigtime.net1
birdviewpsa.com1
consultancy.uk1
erpresearch.com1
fortunebusinessinsights.com1
g2.com1

Twelve of the twelve domain citations in answers naming Planview Changepoint/AdaptiveWork came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

planview.com ranks 7 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Planview Changepoint/AdaptiveWork takes 0% of first choices and BigTime takes 29%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “professional services automation platform”
7
Position for “professional services automation platforms”
8
Its company's site
planview.com shared with Planview's other products; the figures are the site's
Organic visits to its site
about 126,803 a month
Searches its site ranks for
13,791 · 955 in the top three
Sites linking to it
8,365
Paid Google search
1 searches its ads show for, about 0 clicks and $0 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 86 text, 34 image · 120 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2021, as Planview, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 28 in the year, 92 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 41 of 99 in PSA
Segment leader
29%
BigTime
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
2 answers
Its own site cited
in 2 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Planview Changepoint/AdaptiveWork

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Planview Changepoint/AdaptiveWork; a claim can dispute any of them.
Planview ChangePoint / AdaptiveWork 1

Follow Planview Changepoint/AdaptiveWork

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Planview is the company behind Planview Changepoint/AdaptiveWork.
ShowHide

On record

Company records

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
an Enterprise Architecture Management (EAM) platform
For
PMOs, PPM, and Professional Services Automation (PSA) practitioners
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What Planview Changepoint/AdaptiveWork's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: community.planview.com/changepoint-101, blog.planview.com/changepoint-the-amalgamation-of-strategy-and-execution, newsroom.planview.com/planview-completes-acquisitions-of-clarizen-and-changepoint, blog.planview.com/changepoint-eam-most-promising-enterprise-architecture-technology, blog.planview.com/changepoint-enhances-profile-view-for-services-automation-software. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Planview Changepoint/AdaptiveWork's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Planview Changepoint/AdaptiveWork, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Planview Changepoint/AdaptiveWork by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Planview Changepoint/AdaptiveWork is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Planview Changepoint/AdaptiveWork, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at planview.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.