AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Workday PSA · October 2026 Edition
Workday · 1 category · Ranked

Workday PSA

27Judge labels
1First choices
7Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in PSA for enterprise buyers
Rank 29 of 99 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 20% of its 5 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In psa · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Workday PSA for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Professional services automationReceivables and billing0%29 of 9920%5under 10 labels · led by BigTime at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Workday PSA yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Workday PSA across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00011
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500101
GPT-6 Luna01001
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labels1
Comparative8 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained5 labelsNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative27 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Workday users may prefer Workday PSA” GPT-6 Luna · PSA · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“These platforms are powerful but come with significant baggage. You should avoid them if you have fewer than 100 employees” Qwen 3.7 Flash · PSA · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Workday PSA, over the 27 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Workday PSA was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Kantata20 of 279Not among the top eight
Certinia Professional Services Cloud16 of 273Not among the top eight
Rocketlane11 of 270Not among the top eight
Scoro9 of 271Not among the top eight
BigTime9 of 270Not among the top eight
Oracle NetSuite OpenAir7 of 270Not among the top eight
Asana5 of 270Not among the top eight
Planview ChangePoint5 of 270Not among the top eight
Deltek4 of 271Not among the top eight
Teamwork.com4 of 271Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Workday PSA. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 27 answers that named Workday PSA and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

kantata.com21
rocketlane.com15
guideflow.com14
bigtime.net13
g2.com11
teamwork.com10
gartner.com8
productive.io8
scoro.com8
youtube.com8

116 of the 116 domain citations in answers naming Workday PSA came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Workday PSA stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
260 a month (“workday psa”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
6 a month
Its own site
It sits on Workday's site (workday.com), so there are no site figures for it alone

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 29 of 99 in PSA
Segment leader
29%
BigTime
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
27 answers
Its own site cited
in 25 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Workday PSA

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Workday PSA; a claim can dispute any of them.
Workday 1Workday Professional Services Automation 1

Follow Workday PSA

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Workday is the company behind Workday PSA.
ShowHide
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Workday PSA's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Workday PSA, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Workday PSA by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Workday PSA is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Workday PSA, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at workday.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.