Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Procore Pay · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Procore Pay

3Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

3 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Procore Pay was named 3 times in Contractor payments, where Deel led with 27%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market23 of 83

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In contractor payments · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Procore Pay for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Contractor payments	Spend and procurement	0%	23 of 83	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Deel at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Procore Pay yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Procore Pay across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Tailored for construction, with tools for pay apps, lien waivers, and project-level financials.” Mistral Small · Contractor payments · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for construction payments: GCPay or Procore Pay.” Perplexity Sonar · Contractor payments · comparative prompt · alternative

“Construction‑specific draw payments | Procore Payments” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Contractor payments · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Procore Pay, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Procore Pay was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Worksuite3 of 33Not in the top three

Deel3 of 32Not in the top three

Gusto3 of 30Not in the top three

Tipalti3 of 30Not in the top three

Wise Business3 of 30Not in the top three

Remote2 of 31Not in the top three

Papaya Global2 of 30Not in the top three

QuickBooks Payments2 of 30Not in the top three

BILL1 of 30Not in the top three

Fiverr Enterprise1 of 30Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Procore Pay. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named Procore Pay and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

contractor-of-record.com3

guideflow.com3

remote.com3

worksuite.com3

constructionplacements.com2

deel.com2

learn.g2.com2

papayaglobal.com2

wingspan.app2

4dev.com1

Twenty-three of the twenty-three domain citations in answers naming Procore Pay came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

contractor-of-record.com/software/contractor-payouts3

guideflow.com/blog/contractor-payment-software3

remote.com/blog/payroll/best-contractor-payment-tools3

worksuite.com/resources/insights/best-contractor-payment-software3

constructionplacements.com/best-construction-payment-software2

learn.g2.com/best-contractor-payment-software2

papayaglobal.com/blog/10-best-contractor-payment-software2

wingspan.app/articles/best-contractor-payroll-services2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Procore Pay

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Procore Pay; a claim can dispute any of them.

Procore Payments 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Procore Pay's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Procore Pay, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at procore.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.