AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Productive.io · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Productive.io

7Judge labels
3First choices
0Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Productive.io was named 2 times in PSA, where BigTime led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In psa · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Productive.io for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Professional services automationReceivables and billing2%12 of 990%2under 10 labels · led by BigTime at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Productive.io yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Productive.io across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K210001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labels2
Scale-constrained1 label1
Negative1 label1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Productive.io – Best Overall Value” Kimi K2 · PSA · budget prompt · first choice
“Productive.io — Best Value for Agency Profitability” Gemini 3.5 Flash · PSA · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Productive.io, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Productive.io was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Scoro5 of 70Not among the top eight
Certinia Professional Services Cloud4 of 70Not among the top eight
HaloPSA4 of 70Not among the top eight
Teamwork.com4 of 70Not among the top eight
BigTime3 of 70Not among the top eight
Syncro3 of 70Not among the top eight
Avaza2 of 72Not among the top eight
Ruddr2 of 71Not among the top eight
Asana2 of 70Not among the top eight
Kantata2 of 70Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Productive.io. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named Productive.io and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

scoro.com5
youtube.com5
bigtime.net4
capterra.com4
g2.com4
productive.ioYour site4
ruddr.com4
teamwork.com4
kantata.com3
operating.app3

Thirty-six of the forty domain citations in answers naming Productive.io came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

productive.io ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Productive.io takes 2% of first choices and BigTime takes 29%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “professional services automation platform”
3
Position for “professional services automation platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Organic visits to its site
about 102,038 a month
Searches its site ranks for
12,339 · 893 in the top three
Sites linking to it
3,094
Paid Google search
2 searches its ads show for, about 44 clicks and $1,647 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 67 text, 43 video, 10 image · 61 shown in the last 30 days

First shown February 2023, as The Productive Company, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 67 in the year, 53 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 12 of 99 in PSA
Segment leader
29%
BigTime
First choices
3 across its categories
Named in
7 answers
Its own site cited
in 7 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on productive.io
2,594
subdomains included
Content
1,628
counted in the table below
Documentation
657
Product · Integration
6 · 21
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog1,288282026-09-27
Comparison18822026-08-04
Glossary or explainer6362026-09-24
Case study4612026-09-14
Webinar or virtual event2802023-11-20
Report or ebook802026-06-09
Template or tool532026-09-22
Conference or event1undated
News or press102022-02-28
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page productive.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Productive.io

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Productive.io is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Agency Management & Professional Services Automation Software
For
agencies, consultancies, and other professional services businesses
Price stated
Essential, Professional, and Ultimate plans; monthly and yearly billing options; custom pricing for Ultimate productive.io/pricing
Starting price
9 productive.io/pricing
Free plan or trial
Free 14-day trial. No credit card required. Cancel any time. productive.io
Integrations claimed
1000 productive.io/pricing
Certifications
GDPR ComplianceSOC 2 Type II Compliance
Customers named
SaffronMakerstreet Marketing & InnovationDegordianSquare1 SoftwareEnkiPorsche Digital CroatiaInnovate by DaySNCE
Not stated on the pages read
Hosting

What Productive.io's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: productive.io, productive.io/pricing, trust.productive.io, productive.io/use-cases/reporting, productive.io/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Productive.io's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Productive.io, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Productive.io by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Productive.io is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Productive.io, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at productive.io is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.