AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Ringly.io · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Ringly.io

4Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Ringly.io was named 2 times in Chargeback management, where Chargeflow led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In chargeback management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Ringly.io for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Chargeback managementReceivables and billing0%74 of 8150%2under 10 labels · led by Chargeflow at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Ringly.io yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Ringly.io across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00011
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Safer Bets (Lower Complaint Volume) - Prevention-focused like Ringly.io or Claimlane (flat fees, good for alerts)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Chargeback management · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Tools That Promise "Guaranteed" Results (e.g., Signifyd, ClearSale, Ringly.io) ... Verdict: Cautious.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Chargeback management · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Ringly.io, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Ringly.io was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Chargeflow4 of 41Not among the top eight
Chargebacks9113 of 40Not among the top eight
Signifyd3 of 40Not among the top eight
Chargeblast2 of 40Not among the top eight
Disputifier2 of 40Not among the top eight
Ethoca2 of 40Not among the top eight
Justt2 of 40Not among the top eight
Quavo1 of 41Not among the top eight
Shield1 of 41Not among the top eight
Chargeback App1 of 40Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Ringly.io. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named Ringly.io and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

chargeback.io4
chargeflow.io4
ringly.ioYour site4
beastinsights.com3
claimlane.com3
guideflow.com3
chargeblast.com2
devopsschool.com2
g2.com2
getapp.co.uk2

Twenty-five of the twenty-nine domain citations in answers naming Ringly.io came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on ringly.io
1,437
subdomains included
Content
1,046
counted in the table below
Documentation
41
Product · Integration
20 · 40
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog6281862026-10-06Chargeback management, Ecommerce fraud
Comparison3921062026-10-06
Template or tool10102026-10-02
Case study872026-09-30
Glossary or explainer762026-10-05
Report or ebook112026-09-21
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page ringly.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Ringly.io

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Ringly.io is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI phone support for Shopify brands
For
Shopify brand owners and customer support teams
Price stated
$99 per month includes 50 conversations, then $1.99 per additional conversation. 65% resolution guarantee or you don't pay. 30-day money-back guarantee. ringly.io
Starting price
99 ringly.io
Free plan or trial
Try for free ringly.io
Customers named
TechCraft StudioBioLongevity LabsGear RiderLuxeveriaMedivitaHerbionyxHey ZeylaVynzo
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations, certifications, hosting

What Ringly.io's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: ringly.io, ringly.io/pricing, ringly.io/solutions/ai-call-bot, ringly.io/customers, ringly.io/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Ringly.io's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Ringly.io, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Ringly.io by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Ringly.io is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Ringly.io, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ringly.io is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.