Index › Vendors › SQL Server Reporting Services · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

SQL Server Reporting Services

5Judge labels

0First choices

5Negative labels

3 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SQL Server Reporting Services was named 3 times in Financial reporting, where Sage Intacct led with 27%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market131 of 133

under the label threshold

Enterprise86 of 90

under the label threshold

In financial reporting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SQL Server Reporting Services for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Financial reporting and dashboards	Planning and analysis	0%	131 of 133	100%	3	under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SQL Server Reporting Services yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SQL Server Reporting Services across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Do not build a new reporting architecture around standalone SSRS.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial reporting · negative prompt · hard negative

“they're severely limited for self-service dashboards and ad-hoc analytics” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Financial reporting · negative prompt · soft negative

“SSRS and Oracle BI Publisher - less robust than other options.” Llama 4 Maverick · Financial reporting · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SQL Server Reporting Services, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SQL Server Reporting Services was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

IBM Cognos Analytics4 of 50Not in the top three

JasperReports4 of 50Not in the top three

Microsoft Power BI4 of 50Not in the top three

SAP Crystal Reports4 of 50Not in the top three

Microsoft Excel3 of 50Not in the top three

BIRT2 of 50Not in the top three

Google Sheets2 of 50Not in the top three

Pentaho2 of 50Not in the top three

SAP BusinessObjects2 of 50Not in the top three

Cube1 of 50Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SQL Server Reporting Services. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 5 answers that named SQL Server Reporting Services and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

linkedin.com2

reddit.com2

accountsiq.com1

ataccama.com1

atlassian.com1

aufaitux.com1

axioworks.com1

barc.com1

bdo.com1

blazesql.com1

No domain is on file for SQL Server Reporting Services, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

accountsiq.com/blog/breaking-out-of-spreadsheets-why-your-finance-team-needs-more-than-exc1

ataccama.com/blog/5-common-problems-with-enterprise-reporting1

atlassian.com/data/business-intelligence/10-data-visualization-tools1

aufaitux.com/blog/power-bi-vs-other-bi-tools1

axioworks.com/2025/12/popular-bi-and-reporting-tools-strengths-weaknesses-and-using-them-w1

barc.com/avoiding-problems-bi-projects1

bdo.com/insights/digital/sql-server-reporting-services-ssrs-is-reaching-end-of-life-now-wh1

blazesql.com/blog/crystal-reports-alternative1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as SQL Server Reporting Services

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SQL Server Reporting Services; a claim can dispute any of them.

SSRS 2SQL Server Reporting Services (SSRS) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SQL Server Reporting Services's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SQL Server Reporting Services, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.