Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › Taxwire · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Taxwire

24Judge labels
10First choices
1Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
19% in Sales tax automation for mid-market buyers
Rank 3 of 38 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
5 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 16 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
In sales tax automation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Taxwire for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Sales tax automationTax and compliance19%3 of 380%16accepted challenger
Corporate tax provisionTax and compliance0%58 of 980%1under 10 labels · led by Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Tax Provision at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Taxwire yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Taxwire across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.511002
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash02002
Perplexity Sonar20002
Grok 4.1 Fast02002
Mistral Small10001
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick11002
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX21003
MiniMax M2.510001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labels5
Paraphrase7 labels3
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained6 labels2
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 10 of the 10 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd recommend Taxwire if you want a full-service sales tax calculation and filing tool with the least operational burden” Perplexity Sonar · Sales tax automation · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Taxwire is frequently mentioned as a top-rated option specifically for mid-market B2B companies.” MiniMax M2.5 · Sales tax automation · direct prompt · first choice
“TaxWire is the strongest overall pick if you want the most hands-off approach” Perplexity Sonar · Sales tax automation · direct prompt · first choice
“Specifically highlighted as the top-rated platform for mid-market B2B companies” Mistral Small · Sales tax automation · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Taxwire, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Taxwire was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Vertex16 of 242Not in the top three
Anrok13 of 243Not in the top three
Zamp11 of 241Not in the top three
TaxJar11 of 240Not in the top three
Prophit.ai6 of 240Not in the top three
Stripe Tax5 of 240Not in the top three
Kintsugi3 of 241Not in the top three
Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE3 of 241Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Taxwire. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 24 answers that named Taxwire and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

taxwire.comYour site19
learn.g2.com18
taxcloud.com16
guideflow.com14
zamp.com13
galvix.com11
avalara.com10
anrok.com8
techrepublic.com8
prophit.ai7

105 of the 124 domain citations in answers naming Taxwire came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Taxwire

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Taxwire; a claim can dispute any of them.
TaxWire 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Taxwire's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Taxwire, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at taxwire.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.