| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate tax provision | Tax and compliance | 2% | 17 of 98 | 40% | 10 | criticized challenger |
| Sales tax automation | Tax and compliance | 0% | 7 of 38 | 9% | 35 | accepted challenger |
| Global e-invoicing compliance | Tax and compliance | 0% | 23 of 108 | 17% | 12 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 8 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 9 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Need global tax & e-invoicing compliance across many jurisdictions? → Sovos, Vertex, or Pagero” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Global e-invoicing compl · comparative prompt · first choice
“use reputable, integrated solutions (like Avalara, Vertex, TaxJar, or Anrok)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Sales tax automation · negative prompt · first choice
“Corporate income tax (direct tax) | Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE or Vertex” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Corporate tax provision · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Vertex is the preferred enterprise option ... Limitation: Highly complex, expensive, and overkill for a standard lower-to-mid-market company.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Sales tax automation · direct prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Enterprise-focused, indirect tax only (no provision)” Kimi K2 · Corporate tax provision · budget prompt · hard negative
“consider Vertex for indirect tax, but it is not the clearest provision-first choice from the sources I found” GPT-5.4 mini · Corporate tax provision · direct prompt · soft negative
“but those are generally more enterprise-oriented and not the best fit for a limited budget” GPT-5.4 mini · Global e-invoicing compl · budget prompt · soft negative
“Vertex is for large SAP/Oracle enterprises (usually overkill/costly for mid-market)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Global e-invoicing compl · direct prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 163 of the 192 answers that named Vertex and are not a share of its labels.
609 of the 609 domain citations in answers naming Vertex came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Vertex's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Vertex, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at vertexinc.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.