Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › Thunes · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Thunes

54Judge labels
9First choices
7Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
22% in Cross-border payments for enterprise buyers
Rank 7 of 83 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 13 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In cross-border payments · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Thunes for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Cross-border payments and FXTreasury and cash2%7 of 830%13accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Thunes yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Thunes across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501203
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast01102
Mistral Small20002
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00202
Qwen 3.7 Flash10001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.501001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct22 labels9
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative21 labels5not counted in share
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative54 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 14 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Thunes: Best overall for global B2B payouts at scale, covering 140+ countries and 90 currencies.” Mistral Small · Cross-border payments · comparative prompt · first choice
“Thunes is considered the best overall for global B2B payouts” Mistral Small · Cross-border payments · direct prompt · first choice
“Thunes (Best for Enterprise & Infrastructure)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Cross-border payments · comparative prompt · first choice
“Thunes leads the field with unmatched network reach and settlement speed, especially in emerging markets” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Cross-border payments · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Thunes, over the 54 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Thunes was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Airwallex44 of 5410Not in the top three
Wise Business43 of 5416Not in the top three
Payoneer22 of 540Not in the top three
Adyen21 of 542Not in the top three
Nium20 of 540Not in the top three
Stripe19 of 540Not in the top three
Currencycloud13 of 540Not in the top three
Tipalti12 of 541Not in the top three
Checkout.com9 of 540Not in the top three
Rapyd9 of 540Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Thunes. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 51 of the 54 answers that named Thunes and are not a share of its labels.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Thunes's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Thunes, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at thunes.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.