AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Unzer · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Unzer

4Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Unzer was named 3 times in B2B BNPL and terms, where Resolve Pay led with 56%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In b2b bnpl and terms · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Unzer for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
B2B BNPL and net termsReceivables and billing0%20 of 900%3under 10 labels · led by Resolve Pay at 56%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Unzer yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Unzer across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01102
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Europe-focused invoice BNPL with marketplace coverage → Mondu / Billie / Unzer.” Muse Glimmer 30B · B2B BNPL and terms · direct prompt · alternative
“Unzer (4.8/5)” Grok 4.1 Fast · B2B BNPL and terms · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Unzer, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Unzer was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Credit Key4 of 41Not among the top eight
Resolve Pay3 of 42Not among the top eight
Mondu3 of 41Not among the top eight
TreviPay3 of 40Not among the top eight
Billie2 of 40Not among the top eight
Two2 of 40Not among the top eight
Balance1 of 40Not among the top eight
Billd1 of 40Not among the top eight
Biz2Credit1 of 40Not among the top eight
Capchase Pay1 of 40Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Unzer. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named Unzer and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

unzer.comYour site4
finder.com3
resolvepay.com3
solidgate.com3
creditkey.com2
finance.yahoo.com2
fintechspecs.com2
ratiotech.com2
techrepublic.com2
two.inc2

Twenty-one of the twenty-five domain citations in answers naming Unzer came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on unzer.com
1,404
subdomains included
Content
311
counted in the table below
Documentation
13
Product · Integration
16 · 1
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
News or press151undated
Blog7732026-08-31
Template or tool52undated
Report or ebook1402026-04-29
Case study1102025-11-30
Comparison402026-03-27
Conference or event1undated
Glossary or explainer1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page unzer.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Unzer

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Unzer is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Eine zentrale Payment-Plattform für Unified Commerce über alle Vertriebskanäle hinweg, mit persönlicher Beratung und individuell zugeschnittenen Lösungen für unterschiedliche Branchen.
For
Händler
Price stated
E-Commerce Payment: transaction fee from 1.50% + €0.20, monthly service fee from €19, one time setup fee €149; Point-of-Sale Payment: transaction fee from 0.99% + €0.20, monthly setup fee from €29, one time setup fee €99; iPad-based POS software €69 monthly, incl. 19% MwSt.; Mobile POS terminal: POS Go €29 monthly, incl. 19% MwSt.; POS system for gastronomy €99 monthly, incl. 19% MwSt.; POS system for services €99 monthly, incl. 19% MwSt.; POS system for retail €69 monthly, incl. 19% MwSt. unzer.com/en/pricing-information
Starting price
from 1.50% + €0.20 unzer.com/en/pricing-information
Free plan or trial
Neukunden profitieren zudem von einem Startbonus mit zwei kostenlosen Monaten. unzer.com
Certifications
PSD2PCI DSSKassenSichV (Cash Register Security Regulation)GoBD-compliant
Customers named
BonitaLuxusbetten24muli cyclesFashionetteBergzeitTamarisWESTbahn
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations, hosting

What Unzer's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: unzer.com, unzer.com/en/pricing-information, unzer.com/online-payments/compliance, unzer.com/use-cases/refund-payment. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Unzer's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Unzer, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Unzer by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Unzer is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Unzer, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at unzer.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.