19 categories · RankedHighRadius
632Judge labels
120First choices
108Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
19Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
67% in Accounts receivable auto for enterprise buyers
Rank 1 of 83 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
6 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 40% of its 45 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentAn enterprise product: leader at enterprise, not named at small business.
Small business82 of 82
0%37 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market1 of 83
16%45 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise1 of 61
49%52 labels
endorsed leader
In cash application · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named HighRadius for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash application | Receivables and billing | 16% | 1 of 83 | 40% | 45 | criticized challenger |
| Accounts receivable automation | Receivables and billing | 10% | 5 of 77 | 34% | 44 | criticized challenger |
| Business bill pay | Treasury and cash | 9% | 3 of 69 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by BILL at 35% |
| B2B payment acceptance | Receivables and billing | 4% | 8 of 91 | 12% | 16 | accepted challenger |
| Account reconciliation | Accounting and close | 4% | 6 of 72 | 4% | 23 | accepted challenger |
| Invoicing software | Receivables and billing | 2% | 12 of 86 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Wave at 19% |
| Treasury management systems | Treasury and cash | 2% | 11 of 124 | 8% | 12 | accepted challenger |
| Cash flow forecasting | Treasury and cash | 0% | 23 of 86 | 12% | 16 | accepted challenger |
| Global e-invoicing compliance | Tax and compliance | 0% | 22 of 108 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Avalara at 28% |
| Financial close management | Accounting and close | 0% | 13 of 68 | 20% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 60% |
| Financial consolidation | Accounting and close | 0% | 22 of 96 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 19% |
| Internal controls and SOX | Tax and compliance | 0% | 31 of 71 | 20% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by AuditBoard at 18% |
| Accounts payable automation | Spend and procurement | 0% | 57 of 60 | 33% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Stampli at 19% |
| Financial reporting and dashboards | Planning and analysis | 0% | 35 of 133 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 27% |
| Board and investor reporting | Planning and analysis | 0% | 48 of 97 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by OnBoard at 25% |
| Business banking | Treasury and cash | 0% | 34 of 78 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Mercury at 20% |
| Cross-border payments and FX | Treasury and cash | 0% | 50 of 83 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Wise Business at 35% |
| Revenue recognition | Accounting and close | 0% | 55 of 77 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Maxio at 15% |
| Supplier management | Spend and procurement | 0% | 38 of 80 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Procurify at 26% |
Movement
This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for HighRadius yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.
By model
How each model treated HighRadius across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 14 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 18 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 2 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 15 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 4 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 24 |
| Mistral Small | 6 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 19 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 4 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 19 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 4 | 1 | 11 | 1 | 17 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 15 |
| Kimi K2 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 18 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 4 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 18 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 12 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct156 labels51
Paraphrase129 labels50
Comparative157 labels45not counted in share
Budget-constrained66 labels13
Scale-constrained65 labels6
Negative59 labels5not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative632 labels in all, every segment counted; 120 of the 170 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“HighRadius - Offers an embedded payment portal with multi-rail support, accessible directly from invoices, with no separate customer login and no IT buildout required.” Llama 4 Maverick · B2B payment acceptance · direct prompt · first choice
“Go with HighRadius or BlackLine if you are a massive, multi-billion-dollar enterprise looking to standardize cash flow and compliance across multiple ERPs globally.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Cash application · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best for large enterprises with complex, global order-to-cash operations. It's the broadest, most mature suite... Enterprise, end-to-end: HighRadius” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Accounts receivable auto · comparative prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies, I'd recommend HighRadius due to its proven ROI, quick implementation, and outcome-based pricing model.” MiniMax M2.5 · Cash application · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“you want to avoid high-end enterprise AR suites (like HighRadius or Quadient/YayPay), which carry steep implementation fees and long sales cycles” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Accounts receivable auto · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid the usual enterprise leaders like HighRadius, Billtrust, and Esker if budget is the main constraint” Perplexity Sonar · Cash application · budget prompt · hard negative
“they are generally not recommended for the typical mid-market company ... Why to avoid them in the mid-market:” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Cash application · direct prompt · hard negative
“Specific Vendors/Tools with Documented Concerns... 1. HighRadius Reported Issues: - Poor customer support” Kimi K2 · Accounts receivable auto · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as HighRadius, over the 632 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HighRadius was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named HighRadius. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 550 of the 632 answers that named HighRadius and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
highradius.comYour site383
worldmetrics.org228
gartner.com146
g2.com114
bluecopa.com109
transformance.ai102
lunos.ai100
upflow.io97
zipdo.co90
chaserhq.com88
1,074 of the 1,457 domain citations in answers naming HighRadius came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as HighRadius
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as HighRadius; a claim can dispute any of them.
HighRadius Treasury 3HighRadius (Mid-Market Edition) 1HighRadius (RadiusOne) 1HighRadius Cash Application 1HighRadius Cash Application Software 1HighRadius/Billtrust 1
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when HighRadius's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as HighRadius, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at highradius.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.