Finance AI Index
Index Accounting and close Account reconciliation › FloQast vs Numeric
Account reconciliation · September 2026 Edition

FloQast vs Numeric

Four of twelve models named FloQast first on the direct prompt; four named Numeric. FloQast was named by twelve of the twelve models and Numeric by ten and FloQast carries 44 labels and Numeric 28, so the shares are not directly comparable.

FloQast

endorsed leader

Named in ten categories this edition.

Numeric

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

First-choice share33%14%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate9%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#2A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels4428A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, FloQast reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Trintech Adra was named alongside these two in eight of the twelve direct answers. FloQast vs Trintech Adra · Numeric vs Trintech Adra

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the account reconciliation page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
FloQastFirst choices, of twelve modelsNumeric
Direct44
Paraphrase91
Comparative10
Budget-constrained003 against FloQast
Scale-constrained32
Negative001 against FloQast
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where FloQast and Numeric stood in it.

Both were the first choice

1 of 12 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.
Kimi K2FloQast, Numeric alternatives: Prophix One, Trintech Adra

FloQast first, Numeric an alternative

3 of 12 modelsNumeric was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniFloQast alternatives: BlackLine, Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud, Trintech
Perplexity SonarFloQast alternatives: Numeric, Prophix One
Grok 4.1 FastFloQast alternatives: Numeric, Prophix One, Trintech Adra

Numeric first, FloQast an alternative

3 of 12 modelsFloQast was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashNumeric, ZoneReconcile alternatives: FloQast, HighRadius, Trintech Adra
DeepSeek V4 FlashNumeric alternatives: FloQast, Trintech Adra
GLM 4.7 FlashXNumeric alternatives: FloQast, HighRadius, OneStream, Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud, Prophix One, Ramp, Trintech Adra

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Qwen 3.7 FlashTrintech Adra alternatives: FloQast, Numeric, Prophix One
MiniMax M2.5Trintech Adra alternatives: Numeric, Ramp

Neither was named

3 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
Mistral SmallHighRadius, Prophix One alternatives: Sage Intacct, Trintech Adra
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Numeric leads by two points.
Numeric4%#5 of 8
FloQast2%#6 of 8
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: FloQast leads at mid-market.
FloQast33%#1 of 11
Numeric14%#2 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
FloQast leads by four points.
FloQast4%#5 of 8
Numeric0%#8 of 8
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about FloQast

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“only if you're a growing accounting team that can justify a custom-priced close/reconciliation platform; it does not publish simple per-user pricing” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · soft negative
“The best bank reconciliation automation for a mid-sized B2B company would be FloQast, Vic.ai, or US Tech Automations. FloQast is best for mid-market finance teams coordinating a close checklist” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Choose FloQast if your primary pain point is team coordination, communication, and tracking who is doing what during the close.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about Numeric

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“Modern, fast, transaction-level visibility + reasonable pricing → Numeric (especially on NetSuite/Sage Intacct)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top three products in each category. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.