Every category where a model named Numeric for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Financial close management	Accounting and close	19%	2 of 68	2%	42	accepted challenger
Account reconciliation	Accounting and close	14%	2 of 72	0%	28	accepted challenger
AI accounting assistants	Accounting and close	7%	6 of 79	0%	17	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Numeric yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Numeric across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1	3	0	5
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	5	7	1	0	13
Perplexity Sonar	1	6	1	0	8
Grok 4.1 Fast	2	4	3	0	9
Mistral Small	2	1	1	0	4
DeepSeek V4 Flash	4	7	1	0	12
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	5	0	6
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	4	0	1	5
Kimi K2	3	8	0	0	11
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	4	1	0	7
MiniMax M2.5	1	5	1	0	7

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct43 labels16

Paraphrase29 labels8

Comparative50 labels6not counted in share

Budget-constrained29 labels13

Scale-constrained26 labels6

Negative25 labels5not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative202 labels in all, every segment counted; 43 of the 54 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Modern, fast, transaction-level visibility + reasonable pricing → Numeric (especially on NetSuite/Sage Intacct)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Account reconciliation · direct prompt · first choice

“Best For: Mid-market finance teams looking to dramatically compress close times.... It is built for audit scrutiny.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AI accounting assistants · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Numeric stands out as the best financial close management software option for a company with a limited budget” Grok 4.1 Fast · Financial close manageme · budget prompt · first choice

“Numeric - Best for mid-sized to enterprise teams needing transaction-level visibility and AI-driven close.” Llama 4 Maverick · Financial close manageme · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“More flexible pricing, starting around $30/user/month, but still an investment.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Financial close manageme · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Numeric, over the 202 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Numeric was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

FloQast163 of 20236Compare →

BlackLine137 of 20232Not in the top three

Workiva50 of 2021Not in the top three

Trintech47 of 2024Not in the top three

OneStream47 of 2023Not in the top three

Trintech Adra43 of 2024Compare →

QuickBooks Online36 of 20214Not in the top three

Vic.ai36 of 2022Not in the top three

HighRadius34 of 2022Not in the top three

Sage Intacct29 of 2024Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Numeric. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 171 of the 202 answers that named Numeric and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

numeric.ioYour site160

worldmetrics.org64

learn.g2.com63

prophix.com56

bluecopa.com53

financecopilothq.com53

dokka.com50

highradius.com48

doublehq.com39

maxima.ai36

462 of the 622 domain citations in answers naming Numeric came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

numeric.io/blog/financial-close-software92

learn.g2.com/best-financial-close-software60

numeric.io/blog/account-reconciliation-software39

financecopilothq.com/best-financial-close-automation-software35

prophix.com/blog/the-10-best-account-reconciliation-software34

dokka.com/best-financial-close-software-for-small-businesses32

highradius.com/resources/Blog/best-account-reconciliation-tools30

ramp.com/blog/accounting-reconciliation-software26

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Numeric's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Numeric, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at numeric.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.