10 categories · RankedFloQast
328Judge labels
74First choices
63Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
10Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
60% in Financial close manageme for mid-market buyers
Rank 1 of 68 in the mid-market standingendorsed leader
9 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 11% of its 54 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
Small business2 of 87
18%46 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market1 of 68
60%54 labels
endorsed leader
Enterprise3 of 67
9%45 labels
criticized challenger
In financial close manageme · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named FloQast for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial close management | Accounting and close | 60% | 1 of 68 | 11% | 54 | endorsed leader |
| Account reconciliation | Accounting and close | 33% | 1 of 72 | 9% | 44 | endorsed leader |
| Internal controls and SOX | Tax and compliance | 18% | 2 of 71 | 0% | 14 | accepted challenger |
| AI accounting assistants | Accounting and close | 0% | 16 of 79 | 0% | 14 | accepted challenger |
| Financial consolidation | Accounting and close | 0% | 49 of 96 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 19% |
| Cash application | Receivables and billing | 0% | 46 of 83 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by HighRadius at 16% |
| Cash flow forecasting | Treasury and cash | 0% | 74 of 86 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Agicap at 18% |
| Corporate tax provision | Tax and compliance | 0% | 76 of 98 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Tax Provision at 26% |
| Financial reporting and dashboards | Planning and analysis | 0% | 72 of 133 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 27% |
| Lease accounting | Accounting and close | 0% | 29 of 60 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by FinQuery at 36% |
Movement
This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for FloQast yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.
By model
How each model treated FloQast across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 5 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 13 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 11 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 7 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 15 |
| Mistral Small | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 10 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 7 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 16 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 9 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 5 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 11 |
| Kimi K2 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 16 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 3 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 12 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 9 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct74 labels27
Paraphrase58 labels22
Comparative78 labels10not counted in share
Budget-constrained37 labels8
Scale-constrained42 labels17
Negative39 labels4not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative328 labels in all, every segment counted; 74 of the 88 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The best bank reconciliation automation for a mid-sized B2B company would be FloQast, Vic.ai, or US Tech Automations. FloQast is best for mid-market finance teams coordinating a close checklist” Llama 4 Maverick · Account reconciliation · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“The strongest mid-market fits where you'll likely land your shortlist: FloQast (accounting-led, broad ERP support, strong SOX controls)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Financial close manageme · scale prompt · first choice
“Choose FloQast if your primary pain point is team coordination, communication, and tracking who is doing what during the close.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Account reconciliation · comparative prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies going through their first SOX cycles, FloQast offers the best balance of usability and value.” Kimi K2 · Internal controls · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid FloQast/BlackLine unless your close process is highly complex” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Financial close manageme · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid BlackLine, FloQast, and Trintech” Kimi K2 · Financial close manageme · budget prompt · hard negative
“only if you're a growing accounting team that can justify a custom-priced close/reconciliation platform; it does not publish simple per-user pricing” GPT-5.4 mini · Account reconciliation · budget prompt · soft negative
“While popular, users report several concerns: Pricing is not transparent and described as "steep relative to what the platform delivers"” Kimi K2 · Financial close manageme · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as FloQast, over the 328 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and FloQast was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named FloQast. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 277 of the 328 answers that named FloQast and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
numeric.io188
worldmetrics.org122
highradius.com98
learn.g2.com86
bluecopa.com80
prophix.com75
financecopilothq.com66
gartner.com60
dokka.com59
g2.com55
889 of the 889 domain citations in answers naming FloQast came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as FloQast
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as FloQast; a claim can dispute any of them.
FloQast (with AutoRec Add-on) 1FloQast / Chaser 1
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when FloQast's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as FloQast, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at floqast.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.