Finance AI Index
Index Accounting and close AI accounting assistants › Numeric vs Docyt
AI accounting assistants · September 2026 Edition

Numeric vs Docyt

One of twelve models named Numeric first on the direct prompt; zero named Docyt. Numeric was named by nine of the twelve models and Docyt by seven and Numeric carries 17 labels and Docyt 11, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Numeric

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

Docyt

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share7%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#6#8A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels1711A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Numeric reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Sage Intacct was named alongside these two in eleven of the twelve direct answers. Sage Intacct vs Numeric · Sage Intacct vs Docyt · Zoho Books vs Numeric

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AI accounting assistants page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
NumericFirst choices, of twelve modelsDocyt
Direct10
Paraphrase21
Comparative00
Budget-constrained00
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Numeric and Docyt stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Numeric Docyt first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Numeric on the left and Docyt on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Numeric and Docyt stood in it.

Numeric first, Docyt not the choice

1 of 12 modelsDocyt was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashLedge, Numeric alternatives: Ramp, Tabs, Vic.ai

Neither was the first choice, one was named

4 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Perplexity SonarSage Intacct alternatives: DualEntry, Numeric, Vic.ai
Grok 4.1 FastSage Intacct alternatives: Docyt, Oracle NetSuite, QuickBooks Online, Xero
Kimi K2Sage Intacct alternatives: DualEntry, Numeric, Vic.ai
GLM 4.7 FlashXSage Intacct alternatives: Docyt, Zeni

Neither was named

7 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Vic.ai alternatives: Booke AI, DualEntry, Integra Balance AI, Sage Intacct
GPT-5.4 miniSage Intacct alternatives: FloQast, Hyperbots A/P Suite, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Oracle NetSuite
Mistral SmallSage Intacct alternatives: Truewind, Vic.ai
DeepSeek V4 FlashRho, Sage Intacct alternatives: Oracle NetSuite, Vic.ai, Zeni
Llama 4 MaverickSage Intacct alternatives: Truewind, Vic.ai
Qwen 3.7 FlashDualEntry alternatives: Sage Intacct, Vic.ai
MiniMax M2.5Sage Intacct alternatives: DualEntry, Truewind, Vic.ai

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Numeric0%#– of 11
Docyt0%#– of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Numeric leads by five points.
Numeric7%#6 of 14
Docyt2%#8 of 14
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Numeric leads by seven points.
Numeric7%#6 of 8
Docyt0%#– of 8
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Numeric

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“Best For: Mid-market finance teams looking to dramatically compress close times.... It is built for audit scrutiny.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about Docyt

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“I recommend starting with Vic.ai for accounts payable and Docyt for end‑to‑end bookkeeping.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Accounting firm managing many clients → Dext + Karbon or Docyt.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for: Multi-location businesses (e.g., hospitality/franchises)” Grok 4.1 Fast · comparative prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.